A Treatise in: (Dafe Alshubah Walzzun Fi 'Iyrab Qawlihi Azzawajal: ('Innama Amruhu 'Iyza 'Arada shayyan 'An Yaqul Lahu kun Fayakun), Wadafu Ma awradahu Alayhi Almuribun) By Shihab Al-DinAl-Khafaji (Died 1069 AH) Study and Verification

Praise be to God, the praise of the grateful, and prayers and peace be upon His truthful and trustworthy Prophet, and upon his chosen family and companions. And then: This research aims to show the differences in the opinions of ancient and modern grammarians regarding the parsing of the reading of those who read: “be” Nominative or accusative the word that was mentioned in the Almighty’s saying: [His practice, when He intends to do something, is no more than He says, "Be", and it comes to be.].Some of them made the nominative case a resumption, so the estimation according to them is: “So it is” meaning the predicate of a deleted subject. Some of them went to the saying: That the nominative case in “it is” is correct for two reasons: the first is the resumption, and the second is the conjunction with the verb “he says.” The other went to the saying that the nominative case here is a conjunction with the imperative verb “be.” Just as they differed in the reading of the nominative case, they also differed in the reading of the one who put “it is” in the accusative case. They found this reading problematic, and some of them went to challenge its correctness and the impermissibility of basing it on the rules of the Arabic language. Among the modern scholars who explained this phenomenon is Shihab al-Din al-Khafaji, who devoted this treatise to it, entitled: Removing doubts and suspicions in the parsing of the Almighty’s saying: [His practice, when He intends to do something, is no more than He says, "Be", and it comes to be.] And he Removed what the parser brought against him. He detailed their statements and opinions about it and what is related to their interpretations of it.