A Study of Post Keynesian Attempts at Hiding Townshend’s Main Question to Keynes in His November 1938 Letter and Keynes’s Answer

Keynes’s letter of December 7th, 1938, provided a direct answer to Townshend, who asked Keynes the following extremely important question in his letter of November 25th: “This is the nearest I can get to an analysis of the part played by the factor of confidence in the rationale of interest. I believe that its further logical analysis at a deeper level of generalization is connected with the part played by the weight of evidence in your theory of probability, but I cannot see just how…..” (Keynes 1979, 292; italics added). Now Townshend ‘s question actually is “Where in your A Treatise on Probability is your analysis supporting the connection between confidence in the GT and the weight of evidence?” Keynes’s response was direct and straightforward: “As regards my remarks in my General Theory, have you taken account of what I say on page 240, as well as what I say at page 148, which is the passage I think you previously quoted…”. (Keynes 1979; italics added). The clue, given here by Keynes to Townshend, is to p.240 of the General Theory; however, it relates directly, as we will see, to Keynes’s chapter XXVI of the A Treatise on Probability. This paper will trace out how Keynes provided Townshend with the clues needed to recognize Keynes’s modeling of the conventional coefficient in chapter XXVI; however, Townshend gave up and failed to take this last step.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Theoretical and Practical Research in Economic Fields
Published
2024-12-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14505/tpref.v15.4(32).06
Primary Topic
Economic Theory and Institutions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Study of Post Keynesian Attempts at Hiding Townshend’s Main Question to Keynes in His November 1938 Letter and Keynes’s Answer

Michael Emmett Brady
Theoretical and Practical Research in Economic Fields
Economic Theory and Institutions
article

A Study of Post Keynesian Attempts at Hiding Townshend’s Main Question to Keynes in His November 1938 Letter and Keynes’s Answer

Michael Emmett Brady
article en

Abstract

Keynes’s letter of December 7th, 1938, provided a direct answer to Townshend, who asked Keynes the following extremely important question in his letter of November 25th: “This is the nearest I can get to an analysis of the part played by the factor of confidence in the rationale of interest. I believe that its further logical analysis at a deeper level of generalization is connected with the part played by the weight of evidence in your theory of probability, but I cannot see just how…..” (Keynes 1979, 292; italics added). Now Townshend ‘s question actually is “Where in your A Treatise on Probability is your analysis supporting the connection between confidence in the GT and the weight of evidence?” Keynes’s response was direct and straightforward: “As regards my remarks in my General Theory, have you taken account of what I say on page 240, as well as what I say at page 148, which is the passage I think you previously quoted…”. (Keynes 1979; italics added). The clue, given here by Keynes to Townshend, is to p.240 of the General Theory; however, it relates directly, as we will see, to Keynes’s chapter XXVI of the A Treatise on Probability. This paper will trace out how Keynes provided Townshend with the clues needed to recognize Keynes’s modeling of the conventional coefficient in chapter XXVI; however, Townshend gave up and failed to take this last step.

Theoretical and Practical Research in Economic FieldsVol. 15(4)
California State University, Dominguez Hills (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Economic Theory and Institutions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.