Demand, law of demand, Giffen and Veblen effects. Part 2. Non-functional demand and demand puzzles

The present work is a brief review of domestic educational and scientific literature upon the issues of non-functional (according to Leibenstein’s classification) demand. To take into account the influence of social factors, the concept of conspicuous consumption by T. Veblen is used. Attention is paid to inaccurate and controversial statements found in literature, as well as to cases of incorrect interpretation of some types of non-functional demand formed under the influence of social determinants. First of all, this refers to the practice of incorrectly interpreting the Veblen effect as an exception to the law of demand and conspicuous consumption as irrational behavior. A number of recent studies convincingly indicate that conspicuous consumption is capable of exerting a favorable psychological effect on the individual who exhibits it, thereby contributing to an increase in their level of well-being. Using the example of the dissertation services market, it is shown that buyers of custom dissertations who often experience amazing “psychological metamorphoses” subsequently receive the opportunity to successfully convert the acquired symbolic capital into certain privileges. The mathematical model of the Veblen effect proposed in the article allows asserting that the Veblen effect may as well manifest itself as a result of the rational choice of the consumer who may be an individual with any level of income, except for the lowest, completely excluding the possibility of any choice of consumed goods. It is shown that in some cases, to explain the dynamics of demand for a particular good, it is sufficient to take into account the “competition” of the Veblen, price, bandwagon, and snob effects without any reference to paradoxes or exceptions to the law of demand. Along with this, examples of consumer behavior and demand are given, for the interpretation of which Leibenstein’s classification is insufficient.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Theoretical economics
Published
2024-12-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52957/2221-3260-2024-11-12-33
Primary Topic
Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Demand, law of demand, Giffen and Veblen effects. Part 2. Non-functional demand and demand puzzles

Vladimir Tsurikov
Theoretical economics
Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
article

Demand, law of demand, Giffen and Veblen effects. Part 2. Non-functional demand and demand puzzles

Vladimir Tsurikov
article en

Abstract

The present work is a brief review of domestic educational and scientific literature upon the issues of non-functional (according to Leibenstein’s classification) demand. To take into account the influence of social factors, the concept of conspicuous consumption by T. Veblen is used. Attention is paid to inaccurate and controversial statements found in literature, as well as to cases of incorrect interpretation of some types of non-functional demand formed under the influence of social determinants. First of all, this refers to the practice of incorrectly interpreting the Veblen effect as an exception to the law of demand and conspicuous consumption as irrational behavior. A number of recent studies convincingly indicate that conspicuous consumption is capable of exerting a favorable psychological effect on the individual who exhibits it, thereby contributing to an increase in their level of well-being. Using the example of the dissertation services market, it is shown that buyers of custom dissertations who often experience amazing “psychological metamorphoses” subsequently receive the opportunity to successfully convert the acquired symbolic capital into certain privileges. The mathematical model of the Veblen effect proposed in the article allows asserting that the Veblen effect may as well manifest itself as a result of the rational choice of the consumer who may be an individual with any level of income, except for the lowest, completely excluding the possibility of any choice of consumed goods. It is shown that in some cases, to explain the dynamics of demand for a particular good, it is sufficient to take into account the “competition” of the Veblen, price, bandwagon, and snob effects without any reference to paradoxes or exceptions to the law of demand. Along with this, examples of consumer behavior and demand are given, for the interpretation of which Leibenstein’s classification is insufficient.

Theoretical economicsVol. 0(11)
Ulyanovsk State Agricultural Academy named after PA Stolypin (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.