Clinical Probability Assessment using Modified Wells Criteria and D-Dimer for Diagnosis of Lower Limb DVT

Background Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a frequent problem in ambulatory and hospitalized patients. It is linked to considerable illness and death related to post-thrombotic syndrome, pulmonary embolism (PE), and pulmonary hypertension secondary to chronic PE. The comparitively low prevalence of DVT leads to a significant number of negative initial ultrasound (US) examinations. A combination of clinical pretest probability assessment using Modified Wells Score (MWS) and D-Dimer testing and subsequent venous US is a good diagnostic approach. Methods This study is a drescriptive cross-sectional analysis on patients attending UCMS hospital with suspected DVT from September 2021 to March 2023 in order to evaluate the reliability of a combined approach of clinical assessment score (Modified Wells Score) followed by D-dimer test to exclude deep vein thrombosis. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of Modified Wells Score and D-Dimer individually and in combination were noted as outcomes. Results The study was undertaken in 79 patients. Among the patients, 31 out of 79 (39.24%) were confirmed to have DVT (group one), while 48 patients (60.76%) were ruled out for DVT (group two). In individual Modified Wells Score both the sensitivity and PPV were found to be 77.4%, and both the specificity and NPV were found to be 85.4%. The individual D-dimer test sensitivity was 93.5% with a specificity of 87.5%, while PPV and NPV were 82.9% and 95.5%, respectively. In combined strategy the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for the likely group combined with D-dimer test results were 100%, 42.9%, 85.7% and 100% respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for unlikely group combined with D-dimer test results were 71.4%, 95.1%, 71.4% and 95.1% respectively. Conclusion Combination of Modified Well’s Criteria along with D-dimer level increases the sensitivity and Negative Predictive Value in DVT diagnosis in suspected cases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Journal of Eastern Nepal
Published
2024-12-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3126/mjen.v3i2.73037
Primary Topic
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical Probability Assessment using Modified Wells Criteria and D-Dimer for Diagnosis of Lower Limb DVT

Sabir Miya, Rajesh Poudel, Santosh Shah
Medical Journal of Eastern Nepal
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
article

Clinical Probability Assessment using Modified Wells Criteria and D-Dimer for Diagnosis of Lower Limb DVT

Sabir Miya, Rajesh Poudel, Santosh Shah
article en

Abstract

Background Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a frequent problem in ambulatory and hospitalized patients. It is linked to considerable illness and death related to post-thrombotic syndrome, pulmonary embolism (PE), and pulmonary hypertension secondary to chronic PE. The comparitively low prevalence of DVT leads to a significant number of negative initial ultrasound (US) examinations. A combination of clinical pretest probability assessment using Modified Wells Score (MWS) and D-Dimer testing and subsequent venous US is a good diagnostic approach. Methods This study is a drescriptive cross-sectional analysis on patients attending UCMS hospital with suspected DVT from September 2021 to March 2023 in order to evaluate the reliability of a combined approach of clinical assessment score (Modified Wells Score) followed by D-dimer test to exclude deep vein thrombosis. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of Modified Wells Score and D-Dimer individually and in combination were noted as outcomes. Results The study was undertaken in 79 patients. Among the patients, 31 out of 79 (39.24%) were confirmed to have DVT (group one), while 48 patients (60.76%) were ruled out for DVT (group two). In individual Modified Wells Score both the sensitivity and PPV were found to be 77.4%, and both the specificity and NPV were found to be 85.4%. The individual D-dimer test sensitivity was 93.5% with a specificity of 87.5%, while PPV and NPV were 82.9% and 95.5%, respectively. In combined strategy the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for the likely group combined with D-dimer test results were 100%, 42.9%, 85.7% and 100% respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for unlikely group combined with D-dimer test results were 71.4%, 95.1%, 71.4% and 95.1% respectively. Conclusion Combination of Modified Well’s Criteria along with D-dimer level increases the sensitivity and Negative Predictive Value in DVT diagnosis in suspected cases.

Medical Journal of Eastern NepalVol. 3(2)
College of Medical Sciences (NP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.