Promoting sociotechnical perspectives of engineering during a summer bridge program

Abstract Background To address complex challenges of modern society, engineering education needs to help students develop sociotechnical perspectives of engineering. Research has documented efforts to incorporate sociotechnical thinking into undergraduate engineering education, but those perspectives must often compete with more dominant technocentric views. Research is needed to investigate how and why students do or do not adopt sociotechnical views. Purpose/Hypothesis(es) In this study, we investigated the extent to which students' views of engineering changed in the context of an Engineering Summer Bridge (ESB) program, in which engineering is promoted as a socially engaged practice. Design/Method We used a multiple case study methodology to investigate patterns across 24 ESB participants. We gathered multiple sources of data to investigate changes in participants' thinking, including pre/post surveys, weekly reflections during ESB, and follow‐up participant interviews. We grouped participants based on the extent to which they added socially engaged perspectives to their perceptions of engineering. We then identified variables associated with those groupings. Results Approximately one‐third of participants added socially engaged perspectives to their views of engineering. These students tended to have fewer prior engineering experiences prior to ESB and often self‐identified as having limited prior knowledge of engineering. They were also more likely to hold motivations and interests oriented toward the public good. Conclusions Our study identifies variables that potentially support and inhibit students' development of socially engaged views of engineering. It highlights the importance of early learning experiences and suggests that technocentric perspectives can be well established even before students begin their undergraduate programs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Engineering Education
Published
2024-12-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20626
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.32
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Promoting sociotechnical perspectives of engineering during a summer bridge program

Richard Carlos L. Velasco, Shansley Glenn, Jacob Pleasants, Claudia Colonnello et al.
1 citations
Journal of Engineering Education
Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
0.32
article

Promoting sociotechnical perspectives of engineering during a summer bridge program

Richard Carlos L. Velasco, Shansley Glenn, Jacob Pleasants, Claudia Colonnello, Kate Raymond, Brandon Abbott, Samuel Crapitto
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background To address complex challenges of modern society, engineering education needs to help students develop sociotechnical perspectives of engineering. Research has documented efforts to incorporate sociotechnical thinking into undergraduate engineering education, but those perspectives must often compete with more dominant technocentric views. Research is needed to investigate how and why students do or do not adopt sociotechnical views. Purpose/Hypothesis(es) In this study, we investigated the extent to which students' views of engineering changed in the context of an Engineering Summer Bridge (ESB) program, in which engineering is promoted as a socially engaged practice. Design/Method We used a multiple case study methodology to investigate patterns across 24 ESB participants. We gathered multiple sources of data to investigate changes in participants' thinking, including pre/post surveys, weekly reflections during ESB, and follow‐up participant interviews. We grouped participants based on the extent to which they added socially engaged perspectives to their perceptions of engineering. We then identified variables associated with those groupings. Results Approximately one‐third of participants added socially engaged perspectives to their views of engineering. These students tended to have fewer prior engineering experiences prior to ESB and often self‐identified as having limited prior knowledge of engineering. They were also more likely to hold motivations and interests oriented toward the public good. Conclusions Our study identifies variables that potentially support and inhibit students' development of socially engaged views of engineering. It highlights the importance of early learning experiences and suggests that technocentric perspectives can be well established even before students begin their undergraduate programs.

Journal of Engineering EducationVol. 114(1)
University of Oklahoma (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
0.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.