Eight Levels of writing problems: Critical Examination of Research Findings Putting Them into Practice

This article critically examines the findings of the large-scale action research that identified eight levels of writing problems faced by Bachelor’s first-year students. The same writing problems are examined, putting them into practice after a year of the completion of the action research. The aim was to measure their credibility and trustworthiness in a natural classroom setting, which was identical to the action research. The research context for both studies was also similar except for the participants. The participants were also selected purposefully, and the data were collected through tests in both studies. The tests were administered among the twelve students in the action research and the thirteen students in this study. The findings indicated that the participants in both studies faced the eight levels of writing problems, and three writing problems, namely sentence level (SL), paragraph level (PL)and full body level (FBL) were found more difficult for almost all of them. Thus, this article further justified the need to involve students in writing processes as a part of their academic life to help them develop writing skills and achieve academic success.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of NELTA
Published
2024-12-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3126/nelta.v29i1.72640
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Eight Levels of writing problems: Critical Examination of Research Findings Putting Them into Practice

Arun Nepal
Journal of NELTA
Education and Critical Thinking Development
article

Eight Levels of writing problems: Critical Examination of Research Findings Putting Them into Practice

Arun Nepal
article en

Abstract

This article critically examines the findings of the large-scale action research that identified eight levels of writing problems faced by Bachelor’s first-year students. The same writing problems are examined, putting them into practice after a year of the completion of the action research. The aim was to measure their credibility and trustworthiness in a natural classroom setting, which was identical to the action research. The research context for both studies was also similar except for the participants. The participants were also selected purposefully, and the data were collected through tests in both studies. The tests were administered among the twelve students in the action research and the thirteen students in this study. The findings indicated that the participants in both studies faced the eight levels of writing problems, and three writing problems, namely sentence level (SL), paragraph level (PL)and full body level (FBL) were found more difficult for almost all of them. Thus, this article further justified the need to involve students in writing processes as a part of their academic life to help them develop writing skills and achieve academic success.

Journal of NELTAVol. 29(1)
Mid-West University (NP)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Eight Levels of writing problems: Critical Examination of Research Findings Putting Them into Practice — Arun Nepal · Journal of NELTA (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS