Psychometric Validation of the Melbourne Decision Making Questionnaire in the Population of Bangladesh

Decision-making styles play an important role in overcoming the everyday challenges we face. Therefore, it is essential to have a psychometrically sound assessment tool to assess the decision-making styles we use. This study aimed to validate the MelbourneDecision-Making Questionnaire (MDMQ) in Bangla language and cultural context, addressing the lack of available measures for assessing decision-making styles used by the Bangladeshi people. In this study, data were collected from a sample of 300 university students (age mean = 21.20 years) who were selected using the convenience sampling technique. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the four-factor correlated model, as found in the original study. Discrimination indices of items in both classical test theory and item response theory approaches suggested that items could effectively discriminate between low scorers and high scorers in each subscale. Differential item functioning test results showed no preference for a specific gender. Each subscale significantly correlated with Big Five personality traits and life satisfaction. Overall, the results suggest the MDMQ Bangla as a psychometrically sound tool to assess decision-making styles used by Bangladeshi adults. This measure has practical utility for researchers and mental health practitioners, enabling a deeper understanding of decision-making styles among Bangladeshi people, their antecedent factors and their impact on daily life. Bangladesh Journal of Psychology, Vol. 24, December 2024, pp. 61-80

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bangladesh Journal of Psychology
Published
2024-12-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3329/bjop.v24i1.78524
Primary Topic
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychometric Validation of the Melbourne Decision Making Questionnaire in the Population of Bangladesh

Oli Ahmed, Moslima Akter, Lutfun Naher
Bangladesh Journal of Psychology
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
article

Psychometric Validation of the Melbourne Decision Making Questionnaire in the Population of Bangladesh

Oli Ahmed, Moslima Akter, Lutfun Naher
article en

Abstract

Decision-making styles play an important role in overcoming the everyday challenges we face. Therefore, it is essential to have a psychometrically sound assessment tool to assess the decision-making styles we use. This study aimed to validate the MelbourneDecision-Making Questionnaire (MDMQ) in Bangla language and cultural context, addressing the lack of available measures for assessing decision-making styles used by the Bangladeshi people. In this study, data were collected from a sample of 300 university students (age mean = 21.20 years) who were selected using the convenience sampling technique. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the four-factor correlated model, as found in the original study. Discrimination indices of items in both classical test theory and item response theory approaches suggested that items could effectively discriminate between low scorers and high scorers in each subscale. Differential item functioning test results showed no preference for a specific gender. Each subscale significantly correlated with Big Five personality traits and life satisfaction. Overall, the results suggest the MDMQ Bangla as a psychometrically sound tool to assess decision-making styles used by Bangladeshi adults. This measure has practical utility for researchers and mental health practitioners, enabling a deeper understanding of decision-making styles among Bangladeshi people, their antecedent factors and their impact on daily life. Bangladesh Journal of Psychology, Vol. 24, December 2024, pp. 61-80

Bangladesh Journal of PsychologyVol. 24(1)
University of Chittagong (BD)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.