Characterising immune-related adverse events in different types of cancer among Chinese patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been approved for monotherapy and combined therapy with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy in China since 2018. The number of patients receiving ICIs has significantly increased in recent years, and the collection and analysis of this data are crucial for a comprehensive understanding of their clinical outcomes and adverse effects. The effects of ICIs may vary among different ethnic groups, and there is a lack of such data in the Chinese population. This study aimed to investigate the occurrence rate of various types of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) of ICIs in cancer survivors with different types of cancer and explore the associated risk factors. Demographic data, cancer type, dosage, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Score (ECOG-PS), and details of irAEs were collected from 120 participants who underwent ICI treatment. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise the patient population characteristics, while t-tests and Chi-square tests assessed associations between variables. Multiple logistic regression evaluated the relationships between independent variables and the likelihood of experiencing irAEs. The results indicated that the occurrence of less severe G1 and G2 irAEs was 25%, while more severe G3 to G5 irAEs accounted for 5.8% of the total. Among the irAEs, skin toxicity had the highest incidence rate (14.2%), followed by gastrointestinal toxicity (6.7%), and endocrine toxicity had the lowest incidence rate of 2.5%. The multiple logistic regression model revealed that patients with ECOG-PS ≥ 2 are over five times more likely to experience irAEs compared to those with lower ECOG-PS (OR: 5.03, 95% CI: 1.05-24.17). Additionally, patients with cancer stage IV have 11.47 times the odds of experiencing irAEs (OR: 11.47, 95% CI: 1.05-24.17). In conclusion, a substantial proportion of patients receiving ICIs experienced irAEs. Patients with an ECOG-PS score of ≥ 2 and advanced cancer stage are at increased risk for these events, necessitating close monitoring by healthcare professionals. The identification of skin and gastrointestinal toxicities as the most common irAEs revealed the need for targeted education for the patients and their carers to recognise and manage these issues. Furthermore, our findings, in conjunction with existing literature, may guide future research on predictive modelling for high-risk patients receiving ICIs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2024-12-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-82105-3
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Characterising immune-related adverse events in different types of cancer among Chinese patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors

Pedro Fong, Min Zhao, Lirong Meng, X.P. Zhu et al.
8 citations
Scientific Reports
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
2.26
article

Characterising immune-related adverse events in different types of cancer among Chinese patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors

Pedro Fong, Min Zhao, Lirong Meng, X.P. Zhu, Qi Zhang, Jialing Chen, Nana Tsai
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been approved for monotherapy and combined therapy with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy in China since 2018. The number of patients receiving ICIs has significantly increased in recent years, and the collection and analysis of this data are crucial for a comprehensive understanding of their clinical outcomes and adverse effects. The effects of ICIs may vary among different ethnic groups, and there is a lack of such data in the Chinese population. This study aimed to investigate the occurrence rate of various types of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) of ICIs in cancer survivors with different types of cancer and explore the associated risk factors. Demographic data, cancer type, dosage, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Score (ECOG-PS), and details of irAEs were collected from 120 participants who underwent ICI treatment. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise the patient population characteristics, while t-tests and Chi-square tests assessed associations between variables. Multiple logistic regression evaluated the relationships between independent variables and the likelihood of experiencing irAEs. The results indicated that the occurrence of less severe G1 and G2 irAEs was 25%, while more severe G3 to G5 irAEs accounted for 5.8% of the total. Among the irAEs, skin toxicity had the highest incidence rate (14.2%), followed by gastrointestinal toxicity (6.7%), and endocrine toxicity had the lowest incidence rate of 2.5%. The multiple logistic regression model revealed that patients with ECOG-PS ≥ 2 are over five times more likely to experience irAEs compared to those with lower ECOG-PS (OR: 5.03, 95% CI: 1.05-24.17). Additionally, patients with cancer stage IV have 11.47 times the odds of experiencing irAEs (OR: 11.47, 95% CI: 1.05-24.17). In conclusion, a substantial proportion of patients receiving ICIs experienced irAEs. Patients with an ECOG-PS score of ≥ 2 and advanced cancer stage are at increased risk for these events, necessitating close monitoring by healthcare professionals. The identification of skin and gastrointestinal toxicities as the most common irAEs revealed the need for targeted education for the patients and their carers to recognise and manage these issues. Furthermore, our findings, in conjunction with existing literature, may guide future research on predictive modelling for high-risk patients receiving ICIs.

Scientific ReportsVol. 14(1)
Soochow University (CN), Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (CN), Macao Polytechnic University (MO), University of Hong Kong (HK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.