A Co-production Values and Principles Compass to Guide Along the Underused Pathway Comment on "Research Coproduction: An Underused Pathway to Impact"

Co-production in research is not only encouraged but rapidly becoming a required consideration in health research funding. The challenge in defining co-production continues and the misapplication of co-production has led to growing calls for an emphasis on operationalising the values and principles of co-production in research. This commentary considers Rycroft-Malone and colleagues’ key messages about co-production being more than a set of activities, and reflects on the challenges within the academic sector when applying co-production. The Co-producing Meaningful Principles and Sharing Standards (Co-MPASS) tool offers a way to consider co-production values in the early stages of collaboration. Rather than a stand-alone tool for co-production, it is intended to be used with established methods and published toolboxes to emphasise co-production principles through reflection, conversation, documentation, and learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Health Policy and Management
Published
2024-12-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.8835
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Co-production Values and Principles Compass to Guide Along the Underused Pathway Comment on "Research Coproduction: An Underused Pathway to Impact"

Daniel Masterson, Lynn Laidlaw
5 citations
International Journal of Health Policy and Management
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
4.25
article

A Co-production Values and Principles Compass to Guide Along the Underused Pathway Comment on "Research Coproduction: An Underused Pathway to Impact"

Daniel Masterson, Lynn Laidlaw
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Co-production in research is not only encouraged but rapidly becoming a required consideration in health research funding. The challenge in defining co-production continues and the misapplication of co-production has led to growing calls for an emphasis on operationalising the values and principles of co-production in research. This commentary considers Rycroft-Malone and colleagues’ key messages about co-production being more than a set of activities, and reflects on the challenges within the academic sector when applying co-production. The Co-producing Meaningful Principles and Sharing Standards (Co-MPASS) tool offers a way to consider co-production values in the early stages of collaboration. Rather than a stand-alone tool for co-production, it is intended to be used with established methods and published toolboxes to emphasise co-production principles through reflection, conversation, documentation, and learning.

International Journal of Health Policy and ManagementVol. 13
University of Staffordshire (GB), University of Skövde (SE), National Patient Safety Foundation (US), Jönköping University (SE)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
4.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.