A Co-production Values and Principles Compass to Guide Along the Underused Pathway Comment on "Research Coproduction: An Underused Pathway to Impact"
Co-production in research is not only encouraged but rapidly becoming a required consideration in health research funding. The challenge in defining co-production continues and the misapplication of co-production has led to growing calls for an emphasis on operationalising the values and principles of co-production in research. This commentary considers Rycroft-Malone and colleagues’ key messages about co-production being more than a set of activities, and reflects on the challenges within the academic sector when applying co-production. The Co-producing Meaningful Principles and Sharing Standards (Co-MPASS) tool offers a way to consider co-production values in the early stages of collaboration. Rather than a stand-alone tool for co-production, it is intended to be used with established methods and published toolboxes to emphasise co-production principles through reflection, conversation, documentation, and learning.
Authors
- Daniel Masterson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4364-9814)
- Lynn Laidlaw (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6688-6658)
Institutions
- University of Staffordshire (GB)
- University of Skövde (SE)
- National Patient Safety Foundation (US)
- Jönköping University (SE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- International Journal of Health Policy and Management
- Published
- 2024-12-21
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.8835
- Citations
- 5
- Primary Topic
- Mental Health and Patient Involvement
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 4.25