Clinical profile and outcomes of patients with endometrial cancer from Northwest India: A retrospective study

ABSTRACT Background: Endometrial cancer is a significant health concern, but there is a lack of region-specific data on its clinical profile and outcomes in Northwest India. Recognizing the importance of early diagnosis and the evolving landscape of precision oncology, the study incorporated risk stratification based on established guidelines and updated staging. Objectives: The primary objective of the study was to determine the clinicopathological profile of patients with endometrial cancer. The secondary objectives were to estimate the survival outcomes, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) based on various staging protocols. Materials and Methods: We included patients with biopsy-confirmed carcinoma of the endometrium, managed at Mohan Dai Oswal Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab from January 1, 2017 to August 31, 2022. Retrospective data were collected from electronic medical records and patient outpatient department files after ethics committee approval. The data were stratified according to the 2014 consensus guidelines of the European Society of Medical Oncology, the European Society of Gynecological Oncology, and the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology as well as the 2023 staging guidelines from the international federation of gynecology and obstetrics for analysis. Survival was calculated from histopathology confirmation to progression, death, or last follow-up. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) v22, with Kaplan-Meier for survival estimates, Cox regression for survival associations, and log-rank tests for group comparisons. Results: We included a total of 111 patients. The median age of the subjects was 64 years (range 37-88). Surgery was the primary treatment in 109 (98.7%). The 5-year OS and DFS rates were 85.6% and 75.7%, respectively, with high-risk patients showing worse outcomes (3-year OS: 75.2%; 4-year OS: 37.6%) compared to low/intermediate-risk patients (5-year OS: 100%, P < 0.001). Conclusion: This study highlights significant survival variations based on risk stratification in endometrial cancer, underscoring the need for tailored management approaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Research Statistics and Treatment
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/crst.crst_40_24
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.17
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical profile and outcomes of patients with endometrial cancer from Northwest India: A retrospective study

Sandeep Garg, Ishu Sharma, Ashwin Oommen Philips, Nishant Batta et al.
2 citations
Cancer Research Statistics and Treatment
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
1.17
article

Clinical profile and outcomes of patients with endometrial cancer from Northwest India: A retrospective study

Sandeep Garg, Ishu Sharma, Ashwin Oommen Philips, Nishant Batta, Tejinder Kaur, Harpreet Singh, Mridul Anand
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background: Endometrial cancer is a significant health concern, but there is a lack of region-specific data on its clinical profile and outcomes in Northwest India. Recognizing the importance of early diagnosis and the evolving landscape of precision oncology, the study incorporated risk stratification based on established guidelines and updated staging. Objectives: The primary objective of the study was to determine the clinicopathological profile of patients with endometrial cancer. The secondary objectives were to estimate the survival outcomes, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) based on various staging protocols. Materials and Methods: We included patients with biopsy-confirmed carcinoma of the endometrium, managed at Mohan Dai Oswal Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab from January 1, 2017 to August 31, 2022. Retrospective data were collected from electronic medical records and patient outpatient department files after ethics committee approval. The data were stratified according to the 2014 consensus guidelines of the European Society of Medical Oncology, the European Society of Gynecological Oncology, and the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology as well as the 2023 staging guidelines from the international federation of gynecology and obstetrics for analysis. Survival was calculated from histopathology confirmation to progression, death, or last follow-up. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) v22, with Kaplan-Meier for survival estimates, Cox regression for survival associations, and log-rank tests for group comparisons. Results: We included a total of 111 patients. The median age of the subjects was 64 years (range 37-88). Surgery was the primary treatment in 109 (98.7%). The 5-year OS and DFS rates were 85.6% and 75.7%, respectively, with high-risk patients showing worse outcomes (3-year OS: 75.2%; 4-year OS: 37.6%) compared to low/intermediate-risk patients (5-year OS: 100%, P < 0.001). Conclusion: This study highlights significant survival variations based on risk stratification in endometrial cancer, underscoring the need for tailored management approaches.

Cancer Research Statistics and TreatmentVol. 7(4)
Christian Medical College, Vellore (IN), Christian Medical College (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
1.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.