Android Source Code Smells: A Systematic Literature Review

ABSTRACT Introduction Modern software developers strive to develop applications that are robust, easy to maintain, and possess high levels of quality. However, code smells can hinder this goal as they are visible signs of underlying issues. Numerous techniques and tools have been proposed for detecting code smells in various contexts and programming languages. Despite this, research on Android‐specific code smells and their impact on external quality attributes is still in its early stages. Objective This study aims to provide a comprehensive summary of state‐of‐the‐art techniques, tools, and approaches used for detecting and refactoring code smells in Android applications. Methodology A systematic literature review was conducted between November 2007 and December 2023, adhering to standard guidelines. In total, 79 primary studies were identified, analyzed, and synthesized. Results A total of 237 code smells were identified using 51 techniques and tools, based on seven distinct approaches. Efficiency was found to be the most affected external quality attribute. The code smell Durable Wakelock was the most studied. Challenges Despite the extensive research, the software engineering community faces numerous challenges. These include a lack of in‐depth investigation into Android‐specific code smells, a limited number of studied quality attributes, insufficient involvement of industry experts in the research process, scarcity of Android‐oriented metrics, and dependence on industry‐exclusive datasets. Future Directions This review suggests potential research directions that are valuable for researchers and practitioners seeking to gain insights into current open research problems in this domain.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Software Practice and Experience
Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/spe.3401
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Software Engineering Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.34
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Android Source Code Smells: A Systematic Literature Review

Francis Palma, Ghulam Rasool, Muhammad Fawad
3 citations
Software Practice and Experience
Software Engineering Research
2.34
article

Android Source Code Smells: A Systematic Literature Review

Francis Palma, Ghulam Rasool, Muhammad Fawad
article en
3 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction Modern software developers strive to develop applications that are robust, easy to maintain, and possess high levels of quality. However, code smells can hinder this goal as they are visible signs of underlying issues. Numerous techniques and tools have been proposed for detecting code smells in various contexts and programming languages. Despite this, research on Android‐specific code smells and their impact on external quality attributes is still in its early stages. Objective This study aims to provide a comprehensive summary of state‐of‐the‐art techniques, tools, and approaches used for detecting and refactoring code smells in Android applications. Methodology A systematic literature review was conducted between November 2007 and December 2023, adhering to standard guidelines. In total, 79 primary studies were identified, analyzed, and synthesized. Results A total of 237 code smells were identified using 51 techniques and tools, based on seven distinct approaches. Efficiency was found to be the most affected external quality attribute. The code smell Durable Wakelock was the most studied. Challenges Despite the extensive research, the software engineering community faces numerous challenges. These include a lack of in‐depth investigation into Android‐specific code smells, a limited number of studied quality attributes, insufficient involvement of industry experts in the research process, scarcity of Android‐oriented metrics, and dependence on industry‐exclusive datasets. Future Directions This review suggests potential research directions that are valuable for researchers and practitioners seeking to gain insights into current open research problems in this domain.

Software Practice and ExperienceVol. 55(5)
University of New Brunswick (CA), COMSATS University Islamabad (PK)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Software Engineering Research
2.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.