Prognostic factors and surgical approaches for long bone sarcomas: a comprehensive narrative study

This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of various surgical interventions for bone sarcoma, focusing on survival rates, functional outcomes, complication rates, and quality of life. A systematic review and analysis were conducted on six primary surgical interventions, including limb salvage surgery, wide resection, amputation, endoprosthetic reconstruction, biological reconstruction, and rotationplasty. Limb salvage surgery demonstrated the highest functional outcomes (85%) and quality of life scores (8.0/10), while endoprosthetic reconstruction achieved the highest survival rate (75%) but with a higher complication rate (30%). Amputation, despite the lowest complication rate (15%), showed reduced functional scores (65%) and survival rates (55%). Recovery times varied significantly, with biological reconstruction requiring the longest rehabilitation period (16 weeks) and wide resection the shortest (8 weeks). Psychological challenges were notable in amputation cases, with 15% of patients experiencing psychological issues. In conclusion: Limb-sparing procedures, where feasible, offer superior functional and quality-of-life outcomes compared to amputation, though they carry higher complication risks. The choice of surgical intervention should be individualized, balancing oncological and functional considerations. Future research should focus on reducing complication rates, improving prosthetic designs, and standardizing rehabilitation protocols to enhance patient outcomes. Long bone sarcomas, a rare and aggressive group of malignancies, primarily affect the skeletal system and pose significant challenges in clinical oncology. These tumors, which include osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, and chondrosarcoma, are most commonly diagnosed in children, adolescents, and young adults, often leading to substantial morbidity and mortality. Despite advancements in diagnostic imaging, surgical techniques, and systemic therapies, the prognosis for patients with long bone sarcomas remains variable and is influenced by a multitude of factors.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of BioMedicine
Published
2024-12-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18081/2333-5106/2024.12/169
Primary Topic
Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prognostic factors and surgical approaches for long bone sarcomas: a comprehensive narrative study

Wejdi Abbass Yassin Al-Fatlawy
American Journal of BioMedicine
Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Prognostic factors and surgical approaches for long bone sarcomas: a comprehensive narrative study

Wejdi Abbass Yassin Al-Fatlawy
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of various surgical interventions for bone sarcoma, focusing on survival rates, functional outcomes, complication rates, and quality of life. A systematic review and analysis were conducted on six primary surgical interventions, including limb salvage surgery, wide resection, amputation, endoprosthetic reconstruction, biological reconstruction, and rotationplasty. Limb salvage surgery demonstrated the highest functional outcomes (85%) and quality of life scores (8.0/10), while endoprosthetic reconstruction achieved the highest survival rate (75%) but with a higher complication rate (30%). Amputation, despite the lowest complication rate (15%), showed reduced functional scores (65%) and survival rates (55%). Recovery times varied significantly, with biological reconstruction requiring the longest rehabilitation period (16 weeks) and wide resection the shortest (8 weeks). Psychological challenges were notable in amputation cases, with 15% of patients experiencing psychological issues. In conclusion: Limb-sparing procedures, where feasible, offer superior functional and quality-of-life outcomes compared to amputation, though they carry higher complication risks. The choice of surgical intervention should be individualized, balancing oncological and functional considerations. Future research should focus on reducing complication rates, improving prosthetic designs, and standardizing rehabilitation protocols to enhance patient outcomes. Long bone sarcomas, a rare and aggressive group of malignancies, primarily affect the skeletal system and pose significant challenges in clinical oncology. These tumors, which include osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, and chondrosarcoma, are most commonly diagnosed in children, adolescents, and young adults, often leading to substantial morbidity and mortality. Despite advancements in diagnostic imaging, surgical techniques, and systemic therapies, the prognosis for patients with long bone sarcomas remains variable and is influenced by a multitude of factors.

American Journal of BioMedicineVol. 12(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Prognostic factors and surgical approaches for long bone sarcomas: a comprehensive narrative study — Wejdi Abbass Yassin Al-Fatlawy · American Journal of BioMedicine (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS