The Gap between Speaker’s Meaning and Hearer’s Meaning in Communication: Within and Beyond Classical Gricean Theory of Meaning

Under the guidance of classical Gricean theory of meaning, it is conventionally accepted that speaker’s meaning is contingent upon speaker’s intention in communication, whereas hearer’s meaning involves the recognition and interpretation of speaker’s intention according to other principles of meaning in pragmatics. Consequently, a gap emerges between speaker’s intended meaning and the meaning comprehended by the hearer. This paper presents the gap at first and then illustrates three primary factors contributing to it: namely, the unclear boundary between what is said and what is implicated, the indistinct contextual cues, and the different backgrounds of both speaker and hearer. Finally, for the purpose of facilitating effective communication, strategies are proposed to bridge the gap, emphasizing the importance of shared linguistic knowledge and contextual information between speaker and hearer, as well as the hearer’s assuming about the speaker’s intention. It is hoped that the paper would provide some new aspects for the research of communication.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in Linguistics and Literature
Published
2024-12-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22158/sll.v9n1p14
Primary Topic
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Gap between Speaker’s Meaning and Hearer’s Meaning in Communication: Within and Beyond Classical Gricean Theory of Meaning

Peishu Zhou
Studies in Linguistics and Literature
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
article

The Gap between Speaker’s Meaning and Hearer’s Meaning in Communication: Within and Beyond Classical Gricean Theory of Meaning

Peishu Zhou
article en

Abstract

Under the guidance of classical Gricean theory of meaning, it is conventionally accepted that speaker’s meaning is contingent upon speaker’s intention in communication, whereas hearer’s meaning involves the recognition and interpretation of speaker’s intention according to other principles of meaning in pragmatics. Consequently, a gap emerges between speaker’s intended meaning and the meaning comprehended by the hearer. This paper presents the gap at first and then illustrates three primary factors contributing to it: namely, the unclear boundary between what is said and what is implicated, the indistinct contextual cues, and the different backgrounds of both speaker and hearer. Finally, for the purpose of facilitating effective communication, strategies are proposed to bridge the gap, emphasizing the importance of shared linguistic knowledge and contextual information between speaker and hearer, as well as the hearer’s assuming about the speaker’s intention. It is hoped that the paper would provide some new aspects for the research of communication.

Studies in Linguistics and LiteratureVol. 9(1)
Neijiang Normal University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.