Life cycle assessment in energy-intensive industries: Cement, steel, glass, plastic

The cement, steel, glass, and plastics sectors are at the forefront of industrial decarbonization and must make effective, evidence-based strategic choices. For the first time, this work analyzes current implementation of life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology, as a key decision lever, across the aforementioned sectors through a critical, systematic literature review of 256 studies. Results reveal differences in how LCA studies are conducted, and that implementation is fragmented. Many studies did not consider functionality when defining a functional unit, and most do not objectively assess data quality. Significant differences also exist regarding the definition of scope and selection of impact categories and interpretations. Therefore, this work provides recommendations for ‘best practice’ in LCA applied to global industrial sectors, aiding in the development of a consistent and transparent approach to cross-sector LCA implementation. Specifically, functional unit types must be properly defined, cross-sector allocation procedures should be intrinsically linked, a ‘cradle-to-cradle’ system boundary should be used where possible, and these aspects should be synergistically implemented across sectors where possible. Data quality should be assessed objectively, with greater uniformity in impact assessment methodologies, impact assessment categories, and reporting methods. Sensitivity and uncertainty assessments should be completed and reported in line with International Standard Organization (ISO) 14040 and 14044, and a greater focus should be placed on future production processes and technology. This will improve LCA applications and outcomes, allow effective cross-sector comparison, and enhance decision making towards net zero. • Fragmentation of LCA application in cement, steel, glass and plastics. • Varied functionality, scope, impact categories and data quality in LCA implementation. • Recommendations for ‘best practice’ LCA in energy-intensive industries. • Consistent and transparent approach required for cross-sector LCA implementation. • Role of comparable LCA for achieving net zero goal and industrial decarbonization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Published
2024-12-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2024.115245
Citations
21
Primary Topic
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.32
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Life cycle assessment in energy-intensive industries: Cement, steel, glass, plastic

Jacob W. Whittle, Brant Walkley, Rachael Rothman, Lenny Koh et al.
21 citations
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
4.32
article

Life cycle assessment in energy-intensive industries: Cement, steel, glass, plastic

Jacob W. Whittle, Brant Walkley, Rachael Rothman, Lenny Koh, David I Fletcher, Mahmoud H. A. Gadelhaq, Rui Yuan, S. A. Mohamad, Madeline C.S. Rihner
article en
21 citations

Abstract

The cement, steel, glass, and plastics sectors are at the forefront of industrial decarbonization and must make effective, evidence-based strategic choices. For the first time, this work analyzes current implementation of life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology, as a key decision lever, across the aforementioned sectors through a critical, systematic literature review of 256 studies. Results reveal differences in how LCA studies are conducted, and that implementation is fragmented. Many studies did not consider functionality when defining a functional unit, and most do not objectively assess data quality. Significant differences also exist regarding the definition of scope and selection of impact categories and interpretations. Therefore, this work provides recommendations for ‘best practice’ in LCA applied to global industrial sectors, aiding in the development of a consistent and transparent approach to cross-sector LCA implementation. Specifically, functional unit types must be properly defined, cross-sector allocation procedures should be intrinsically linked, a ‘cradle-to-cradle’ system boundary should be used where possible, and these aspects should be synergistically implemented across sectors where possible. Data quality should be assessed objectively, with greater uniformity in impact assessment methodologies, impact assessment categories, and reporting methods. Sensitivity and uncertainty assessments should be completed and reported in line with International Standard Organization (ISO) 14040 and 14044, and a greater focus should be placed on future production processes and technology. This will improve LCA applications and outcomes, allow effective cross-sector comparison, and enhance decision making towards net zero. • Fragmentation of LCA application in cement, steel, glass and plastics. • Varied functionality, scope, impact categories and data quality in LCA implementation. • Recommendations for ‘best practice’ LCA in energy-intensive industries. • Consistent and transparent approach required for cross-sector LCA implementation. • Role of comparable LCA for achieving net zero goal and industrial decarbonization.

Renewable and Sustainable Energy ReviewsVol. 211
University of Sheffield (GB)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
4.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.