Do chromogenic assays of soil enzyme activities need buffers? More disadvantages than advantages of modified universal buffer in the para-nitrophenyl-based assay of phosphomonoesterase and β-glucosidase activities

Buffers are commonly employed in soil enzyme activity assays to maintain a constant pH during the assay incubation, but soils are already buffered and buffer can alter apparent V max and K m . To test for potential artifacts of buffer on soil enzyme activities, we selected 32 soils to furnish a broad range of physicochemical characteristics and assayed soil β-glucosidase (BG) and phosphomonoesterase (PME) activities at varied substrate concentrations in water or in modified universal buffer (MUB). The pH of assays differed by up to 1.6 units from the measured soil pH (1:2, m/v in water), but MUB did not maintain pH any better than water. Compared to water, MUB generally suppressed activities (by ≈31%), apparent V max (by ≈32%) and K m (by ≈52%) of PME, but yielded similar activities (by ≈4% difference) and apparent V max (by ≈9% difference) for BG. Soils with higher pH tended to have larger degree of PME actvity suppression by MUB compared to water. Based on the best practice of using a substrate concentration that is 5 × K m to approximate substrate saturation of the enzyme, the median substrate requirement to assay PME across the 32 soils was ≈50 mM g −1 in water and 25 mM g −1 in MUB. Regardless of assay matrix, the commonly employed PME substrate concentration of 10 mM g −1 (e.g., Tabatabai, 1994) is insufficient for accurate activity assays (i.e., activities assayed at V max ). In contrast, for BG assays the commonly used p NP-linked substrate concentration of 10 mM g −1 appears appropriate for most soils with a median substrate requirement of ≈4 mM g −1 in water and ≈6 mM g −1 in MUB. Our results support previous propositions that buffers are unnecessary for assaying soil enzyme activities and may alter apparent kinetic parameters (K m , V max ). Potential soil- and enzyme-specific substrate requirements should be determined a priori to ensure accurate measurements of enzyme activities in soils. • Water and modified universal buffer (MUB) maintain assay pH similarly for 32 soils. • Lower PME activities (31%), apparent V max (32%) and K m (52%) in MUB vs water. • Soils with higher pH had larger degree of PME activity suppression in MUB vs water. • Similar BG activities, V max and K m between matrix types. • Median substrate requirements ≈ 50 mM g −1 for PME and 25 mM g −1 for BG.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
Published
2024-12-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2024.109704
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.70

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do chromogenic assays of soil enzyme activities need buffers? More disadvantages than advantages of modified universal buffer in the para-nitrophenyl-based assay of phosphomonoesterase and β-glucosidase activities

Jordon Wade, Skye Wills, Andrew J. Margenot, Kelly Vollbracht et al.
3 citations
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
0.70
article

Do chromogenic assays of soil enzyme activities need buffers? More disadvantages than advantages of modified universal buffer in the para-nitrophenyl-based assay of phosphomonoesterase and β-glucosidase activities

Jordon Wade, Skye Wills, Andrew J. Margenot, Kelly Vollbracht, Diane G. Hooper, Chongyang Li
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Buffers are commonly employed in soil enzyme activity assays to maintain a constant pH during the assay incubation, but soils are already buffered and buffer can alter apparent V max and K m . To test for potential artifacts of buffer on soil enzyme activities, we selected 32 soils to furnish a broad range of physicochemical characteristics and assayed soil β-glucosidase (BG) and phosphomonoesterase (PME) activities at varied substrate concentrations in water or in modified universal buffer (MUB). The pH of assays differed by up to 1.6 units from the measured soil pH (1:2, m/v in water), but MUB did not maintain pH any better than water. Compared to water, MUB generally suppressed activities (by ≈31%), apparent V max (by ≈32%) and K m (by ≈52%) of PME, but yielded similar activities (by ≈4% difference) and apparent V max (by ≈9% difference) for BG. Soils with higher pH tended to have larger degree of PME actvity suppression by MUB compared to water. Based on the best practice of using a substrate concentration that is 5 × K m to approximate substrate saturation of the enzyme, the median substrate requirement to assay PME across the 32 soils was ≈50 mM g −1 in water and 25 mM g −1 in MUB. Regardless of assay matrix, the commonly employed PME substrate concentration of 10 mM g −1 (e.g., Tabatabai, 1994) is insufficient for accurate activity assays (i.e., activities assayed at V max ). In contrast, for BG assays the commonly used p NP-linked substrate concentration of 10 mM g −1 appears appropriate for most soils with a median substrate requirement of ≈4 mM g −1 in water and ≈6 mM g −1 in MUB. Our results support previous propositions that buffers are unnecessary for assaying soil enzyme activities and may alter apparent kinetic parameters (K m , V max ). Potential soil- and enzyme-specific substrate requirements should be determined a priori to ensure accurate measurements of enzyme activities in soils. • Water and modified universal buffer (MUB) maintain assay pH similarly for 32 soils. • Lower PME activities (31%), apparent V max (32%) and K m (52%) in MUB vs water. • Soils with higher pH had larger degree of PME activity suppression in MUB vs water. • Similar BG activities, V max and K m between matrix types. • Median substrate requirements ≈ 50 mM g −1 for PME and 25 mM g −1 for BG.

Soil Biology and BiochemistryVol. 202
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
0.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.