Guidance and Counselling Program Audit: A Survey Method

This study aims to conduct an audit of the guidance and counseling program. This research was conducted using the survey method. The participants were 30 guidance and counseling teachers in different schools in Bandung-Indonesia. This study used a questionnaire instrument developed from ASCA (2003), and adapted according to Indonesian conditions. The instrument consists of 4 indicators (foundation, delivery, management, and accountability) covering 17 components with 110 statement items. This data collection used google form so that it was easily filled in by teachers. The data analysis used descriptive statistics by calculating the percentage of each component and indicator, then calculating the average percentage of the guidance and counseling program as a whole. The results of the average percentage of this program audit are categorized into good, fairly good, less good, and not good. The results of this study indicate that the average percentage of the overall guidance and counseling program is 78.53% (fairly good). The indicator with the highest achievement is foundation with an average percentage of 83.67% (good), and the indicator with the lowest achievement is management with an average percentage of 71.71% (fairly good). This research serves as an evaluation to see the strengths and weaknesses of the guidance and counseling program in Bandung-Indonesia. Thus, this becomes the basis for developing effective guidance and counselling programs in Indonesia in the future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences
Published
2024-11-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55549/epess.847
Primary Topic
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Guidance and Counselling Program Audit: A Survey Method

Nandang Rusmana, Irfan Fauzi, Syamsu Yusuf
The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
article

Guidance and Counselling Program Audit: A Survey Method

Nandang Rusmana, Irfan Fauzi, Syamsu Yusuf
article en

Abstract

This study aims to conduct an audit of the guidance and counseling program. This research was conducted using the survey method. The participants were 30 guidance and counseling teachers in different schools in Bandung-Indonesia. This study used a questionnaire instrument developed from ASCA (2003), and adapted according to Indonesian conditions. The instrument consists of 4 indicators (foundation, delivery, management, and accountability) covering 17 components with 110 statement items. This data collection used google form so that it was easily filled in by teachers. The data analysis used descriptive statistics by calculating the percentage of each component and indicator, then calculating the average percentage of the guidance and counseling program as a whole. The results of the average percentage of this program audit are categorized into good, fairly good, less good, and not good. The results of this study indicate that the average percentage of the overall guidance and counseling program is 78.53% (fairly good). The indicator with the highest achievement is foundation with an average percentage of 83.67% (good), and the indicator with the lowest achievement is management with an average percentage of 71.71% (fairly good). This research serves as an evaluation to see the strengths and weaknesses of the guidance and counseling program in Bandung-Indonesia. Thus, this becomes the basis for developing effective guidance and counselling programs in Indonesia in the future.

The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social SciencesVol. 38
Indonesia University of Education (ID)
Lembaga Pengelola Dana Pendidikan
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.