Impact of COVID-19 on heart rate variability in post-COVID individuals compared to a control group

This study investigated the impact of mild COVID-19 on HRV in groups stratified by time after infection and to compare to a healthy group of the same age without previous virus infection and without need of hospitalization. This is a cross-sectional study. We divided the sample into four groups: control group (CG) (n = 31), group 1 (G1): ≤6 weeks (n = 34), group 2 (G2): 2-6 months (n = 30), group 3 (G3): 7-12 months (n = 35) after infection. For HRV analysis, we used the indices of linear (time and frequency domain) and non-linear analysis. For comparisons between groups, ANOVA one way test or Kruskal-Wallis was used according to the data distribution. The effect size was calculated based on Cohen's d or η<sup>2</sup>. Simple and multiple linear regressions were performed to investigate the interaction between clinical outcomes and HRV parameters. A total of 130 individuals were included. Groups G1 and G2 showed less parasympathetic modulation when compared to CG (p < 0.05), while G3 showed an increase in parasympathetic modulation when compared to G1 (p < 0.05). Moderate to large effect sizes were found according to Cohen d or η<sup>2</sup>. The multiple linear regression models identified age and infection duration as significant predictors for RMSSD (adjusted R<sup>2</sup> = 0.227) and SD1 (adjusted R<sup>2</sup> = 0.242), while age was significant for SDNN (adjusted R<sup>2</sup> = 0.213). BMI, hypertension, and dyslipidemia were non-significant in all models. For HF (n.u.), infection duration was consistently significant, with stress emerging as a predictor in Model 2 (adjusted R<sup>2</sup> = 0.143). The recovery time since diagnosis and age influences recovery from HRV, suggesting a transient effect of the disease on the autonomic nervous system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2024-12-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-82411-w
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.41

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of COVID-19 on heart rate variability in post-COVID individuals compared to a control group

Izadora Moraes Dourado, Lucivalda Viegas de Almeida, Sigrid de Sousa dos Santos, Aldair Darlan Santos‐de‐Araújo et al.
6 citations
Scientific Reports
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
2.41
article

Impact of COVID-19 on heart rate variability in post-COVID individuals compared to a control group

Izadora Moraes Dourado, Lucivalda Viegas de Almeida, Sigrid de Sousa dos Santos, Aldair Darlan Santos‐de‐Araújo, Daniela Bassi‐Dibai, Shane A. Phillips, Audrey Borghi-Silva, Renan Shida Marinho
article en
6 citations

Abstract

This study investigated the impact of mild COVID-19 on HRV in groups stratified by time after infection and to compare to a healthy group of the same age without previous virus infection and without need of hospitalization. This is a cross-sectional study. We divided the sample into four groups: control group (CG) (n = 31), group 1 (G1): ≤6 weeks (n = 34), group 2 (G2): 2-6 months (n = 30), group 3 (G3): 7-12 months (n = 35) after infection. For HRV analysis, we used the indices of linear (time and frequency domain) and non-linear analysis. For comparisons between groups, ANOVA one way test or Kruskal-Wallis was used according to the data distribution. The effect size was calculated based on Cohen's d or η<sup>2</sup>. Simple and multiple linear regressions were performed to investigate the interaction between clinical outcomes and HRV parameters. A total of 130 individuals were included. Groups G1 and G2 showed less parasympathetic modulation when compared to CG (p < 0.05), while G3 showed an increase in parasympathetic modulation when compared to G1 (p < 0.05). Moderate to large effect sizes were found according to Cohen d or η<sup>2</sup>. The multiple linear regression models identified age and infection duration as significant predictors for RMSSD (adjusted R<sup>2</sup> = 0.227) and SD1 (adjusted R<sup>2</sup> = 0.242), while age was significant for SDNN (adjusted R<sup>2</sup> = 0.213). BMI, hypertension, and dyslipidemia were non-significant in all models. For HF (n.u.), infection duration was consistently significant, with stress emerging as a predictor in Model 2 (adjusted R<sup>2</sup> = 0.143). The recovery time since diagnosis and age influences recovery from HRV, suggesting a transient effect of the disease on the autonomic nervous system.

Scientific ReportsVol. 14(1)
Universidade Federal de São Carlos (BR), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), University of Illinois Chicago (US), Universidade Ceuma (BR)
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e ao Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico do Maranhão
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
2.41
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.