New algorithms for restoring DNA matrix and their statistical study

In the proposed paper, we continue to consider various heuristics for reconstructing distance matrices between DNA sequences; as before, we prefer to consider mitochondrial DNA. In the paper, we apply new heuristics. First, every time we receive a new matrix value, we return to the previously restored elements, select the one that gives the maximum value of badness, and try to improve it based on the newly obtained elements. Secondly, when choosing the final value of an element, we select for the first approximation several values close to the optimal one (in practice, there are up to 10 of them), after which we use correlation analysis to select the closest one. We conducted computational experiments on the mitochondrial DNA of all 32 genera of monkeys. At the same time, we restored not one matrix, but 40 matrices: 10 times obtained for each of 4 different sparsity variants. We average the obtained calculation results in several different ways, in particular, by discarding the two smallest and two largest values, as well as using variants of the risk function. The results obtained indicate that in order to obtain a matrix for all types of monkeys in the future, it is desirable to have about 10–12% of the data: simplifying the situation somewhat, we can say that 7–8% gives less adequate recovery results, and, vice versa, 15% and more do not improve the value of badness (compared to 10%). At the same time, obtaining exactly such a full matrix by the algorithm for calculating DNA distance should take about 20–25 days of computer operation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cybernetics and Physics
Published
2024-12-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35470/2226-4116-2024-13-4-288-295
Primary Topic
DNA and Biological Computing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

New algorithms for restoring DNA matrix and their statistical study

Boris Melnikov
Cybernetics and Physics
DNA and Biological Computing
article

New algorithms for restoring DNA matrix and their statistical study

Boris Melnikov
article en

Abstract

In the proposed paper, we continue to consider various heuristics for reconstructing distance matrices between DNA sequences; as before, we prefer to consider mitochondrial DNA. In the paper, we apply new heuristics. First, every time we receive a new matrix value, we return to the previously restored elements, select the one that gives the maximum value of badness, and try to improve it based on the newly obtained elements. Secondly, when choosing the final value of an element, we select for the first approximation several values close to the optimal one (in practice, there are up to 10 of them), after which we use correlation analysis to select the closest one. We conducted computational experiments on the mitochondrial DNA of all 32 genera of monkeys. At the same time, we restored not one matrix, but 40 matrices: 10 times obtained for each of 4 different sparsity variants. We average the obtained calculation results in several different ways, in particular, by discarding the two smallest and two largest values, as well as using variants of the risk function. The results obtained indicate that in order to obtain a matrix for all types of monkeys in the future, it is desirable to have about 10–12% of the data: simplifying the situation somewhat, we can say that 7–8% gives less adequate recovery results, and, vice versa, 15% and more do not improve the value of badness (compared to 10%). At the same time, obtaining exactly such a full matrix by the algorithm for calculating DNA distance should take about 20–25 days of computer operation.

Cybernetics and Physics(Volume 13, 2024, Number 4)
Shenzhen University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
DNA and Biological Computing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.