Teachers’ and students’ beliefs on developing argumentative competence

When we deal with argumentative competence in class there are many points of view: teacher’s and student’s point of view and the external point of view of knowledge (in a theoretical sense). The research shows a qualitative experimental study that allows a comparison between different perspectives in order to measure argumentative competence. The study involved 5 classes and 9 teachers. First, the idea of argumentative competence was discussed from a theoretical and institutional point of view in the Italian school system. Then questionnaires were administered to teachers and deep interviews were conducted with students. Finally, teachers participated in focus groups, and this allowed reflections and encouraged discussion. The process implemented allowed an in-depth key on the concept of argumentative competence. Also, the analysis of the results of the questionnaire and interviews shows how classroom practices are related to teacher and students’ attitudes and beliefs in mathematics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Edma 0-6 Educación Matemática en la Infancia
Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24197/edmain.2.2024.60-72
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.10
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Teachers’ and students’ beliefs on developing argumentative competence

Camilla Spagnolo
1 citations
Edma 0-6 Educación Matemática en la Infancia
Education and Critical Thinking Development
2.10
article

Teachers’ and students’ beliefs on developing argumentative competence

Camilla Spagnolo
article en
1 citations

Abstract

When we deal with argumentative competence in class there are many points of view: teacher’s and student’s point of view and the external point of view of knowledge (in a theoretical sense). The research shows a qualitative experimental study that allows a comparison between different perspectives in order to measure argumentative competence. The study involved 5 classes and 9 teachers. First, the idea of argumentative competence was discussed from a theoretical and institutional point of view in the Italian school system. Then questionnaires were administered to teachers and deep interviews were conducted with students. Finally, teachers participated in focus groups, and this allowed reflections and encouraged discussion. The process implemented allowed an in-depth key on the concept of argumentative competence. Also, the analysis of the results of the questionnaire and interviews shows how classroom practices are related to teacher and students’ attitudes and beliefs in mathematics.

Edma 0-6 Educación Matemática en la InfanciaVol. 13(2)
University of Ferrara (IT)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
2.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.