Performance, meat quality and blood parameters in four strains of organic broilers differ according to range use

Chicken meat production in organic systems involves free-range access where animals can express foraging and locomotor behaviours. These behaviours may promote outdoor feed intake, but at the same time energy expenditure when exploring the outdoor area. More generally, the relationship of range use with metabolism, welfare including health, growth performance and meat quality needs to be better understood. We studied four strains of intermediate (JA757) to slow-growing (S757N, White Bresse and a dual-purpose strain) meat-type chickens with outdoor access. We selected 25 males high- (HR) and low-rangers (LR) per strain. Only in JA757, HR exhibited lower body weight before range access, which may have predisposed them to use the range more. Carcass weight and/or carcass yield were significantly lower in HR compared to LR, showing a negative trade-off between range use and growth performance in all strains. Breast meat yellowness was higher in HR compared to LR in JA757 and the dual-purpose strain, probably due to carotenoids intake from the grass. No relationship between range use and welfare indicators at slaughter was reported whatever the strain. Chicken metabolism differed by range use as HR and LR diverged for blood biomarkers of oxidative and metabolic status, immune and inflammatory system response.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2024-12-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-81672-9
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.05

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance, meat quality and blood parameters in four strains of organic broilers differ according to range use

Claire Bonnefous, Nathalie Couroussé, Thierry Bordeau, Laurence L.A. Guilloteau et al.
6 citations
Scientific Reports
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
2.05
article

Performance, meat quality and blood parameters in four strains of organic broilers differ according to range use

Claire Bonnefous, Nathalie Couroussé, Thierry Bordeau, Laurence L.A. Guilloteau, Elisa Angelucci, Estelle Godet, Maxime Reverchon, Laure Ravon, S. Mignon, Pascal Chartrin, Cesare Castellini, Simona Mattioli, Émilie Raynaud, Vanessa Guesdon, Elisabeth Le Bihan-Duval, Karine Germain, Ludovic Calandreau, Cécile Berri, Estelle Cailleau-Audouin, Anne Collin
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Chicken meat production in organic systems involves free-range access where animals can express foraging and locomotor behaviours. These behaviours may promote outdoor feed intake, but at the same time energy expenditure when exploring the outdoor area. More generally, the relationship of range use with metabolism, welfare including health, growth performance and meat quality needs to be better understood. We studied four strains of intermediate (JA757) to slow-growing (S757N, White Bresse and a dual-purpose strain) meat-type chickens with outdoor access. We selected 25 males high- (HR) and low-rangers (LR) per strain. Only in JA757, HR exhibited lower body weight before range access, which may have predisposed them to use the range more. Carcass weight and/or carcass yield were significantly lower in HR compared to LR, showing a negative trade-off between range use and growth performance in all strains. Breast meat yellowness was higher in HR compared to LR in JA757 and the dual-purpose strain, probably due to carotenoids intake from the grass. No relationship between range use and welfare indicators at slaughter was reported whatever the strain. Chicken metabolism differed by range use as HR and LR diverged for blood biomarkers of oxidative and metabolic status, immune and inflammatory system response.

Scientific ReportsVol. 14(1)
Université de Tours (FR), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), University of Perugia (IT), Syndicat des Sélectionneurs Avicoles et Aquacoles Français (FR), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Institut de l’Elevage (FR), Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements (FR), Biologie des oiseaux et aviculture (FR), Forschungsinstitut für Biologischen Landbau (CH)
European Commission, Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
2.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.