The Libri feudorum

Summary This article mainly reviews Attilio Stella’s new edition of the Latin text of the Libri feudorum and his new English translation thereof. Additionally, it seemed useful to recall and summarize Peter Weimar’s authoritative and convincing views regarding the notoriously complicated history of the formation of the Libri feudorum and their Glossa ordinaria . Moreover, some remarks are made on the surviving medieval manuscripts and the printed editions (1472–1896) of the Latin text. Previous translations into various languages (1493–2016) are discussed. Stella’s new translation is then addressed. It may be called sound and solid. It is but rarely that some nuance does not return in the translation. If the choice of Lehmann’s Latin text (1896) is debatable, its inconvenience has been compensated by references to Osenbrüggen’s standard edition (1840). Stella’s annotation to the translation is rich and ingenious and gives delightful explanations of many unclear or ambiguous passages.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis / Revue d Histoire du Droit / The Legal History Review
Published
2024-12-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/15718190-20243412
Primary Topic
Historical Studies of British Isles
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Libri feudorum

Jeroen M.J. Chorus
Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis / Revue d Histoire du Droit / The Legal History Review
Historical Studies of British Isles
article

The Libri feudorum

Jeroen M.J. Chorus
article en

Abstract

Summary This article mainly reviews Attilio Stella’s new edition of the Latin text of the Libri feudorum and his new English translation thereof. Additionally, it seemed useful to recall and summarize Peter Weimar’s authoritative and convincing views regarding the notoriously complicated history of the formation of the Libri feudorum and their Glossa ordinaria . Moreover, some remarks are made on the surviving medieval manuscripts and the printed editions (1472–1896) of the Latin text. Previous translations into various languages (1493–2016) are discussed. Stella’s new translation is then addressed. It may be called sound and solid. It is but rarely that some nuance does not return in the translation. If the choice of Lehmann’s Latin text (1896) is debatable, its inconvenience has been compensated by references to Osenbrüggen’s standard edition (1840). Stella’s annotation to the translation is rich and ingenious and gives delightful explanations of many unclear or ambiguous passages.

Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis / Revue d Histoire du Droit / The Legal History ReviewVol. 92(3-4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Historical Studies of British Isles
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.