Which impacts matter for pavement management decisions? Quantifying social sustainability based on a capability approach

This study addresses the need to evaluate the social sustainability of pavement management decisions, particularly during the use and maintenance stages. While Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA) are well-established for assessing environmental and economic impacts, Social Life Cycle Assessment (S-LCA) remains understudied for pavements, especially within the context of pavement management. This research introduces a methodology using the Capability Approach to quantify social impacts, emphasizing their importance, relevance, and influenceability. The resulting framework provides a working list of key social impacts such as fatalities, bodily health, mobility, comfort, environmental emissions, financial impact, and equity. These impacts are particularly relevant during the use and maintenance stages of pavement life cycle, where management decisions directly affect road users and surrounding communities. A case study illustrates the application of this framework, analyzing pavement conditions and their social impacts on communities. This study offers a structured approach for integrating social sustainability into pavement management decisions. • Capability Approach is used to quantify social sustainability in pavement management. • The study focuses on how pavement management decisions influence human well-being. • Impacts include health, mobility, comfort, environmental, financial, and equity. • A U.S. based case study illustrates the application of the framework.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Published
2024-12-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2024.101312
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Which impacts matter for pavement management decisions? Quantifying social sustainability based on a capability approach

Jessica Boakye, Egemen Okte
3 citations
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
0.80
article

Which impacts matter for pavement management decisions? Quantifying social sustainability based on a capability approach

Jessica Boakye, Egemen Okte
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This study addresses the need to evaluate the social sustainability of pavement management decisions, particularly during the use and maintenance stages. While Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA) are well-established for assessing environmental and economic impacts, Social Life Cycle Assessment (S-LCA) remains understudied for pavements, especially within the context of pavement management. This research introduces a methodology using the Capability Approach to quantify social impacts, emphasizing their importance, relevance, and influenceability. The resulting framework provides a working list of key social impacts such as fatalities, bodily health, mobility, comfort, environmental emissions, financial impact, and equity. These impacts are particularly relevant during the use and maintenance stages of pavement life cycle, where management decisions directly affect road users and surrounding communities. A case study illustrates the application of this framework, analyzing pavement conditions and their social impacts on communities. This study offers a structured approach for integrating social sustainability into pavement management decisions. • Capability Approach is used to quantify social sustainability in pavement management. • The study focuses on how pavement management decisions influence human well-being. • Impacts include health, mobility, comfort, environmental, financial, and equity. • A U.S. based case study illustrates the application of the framework.

Transportation Research Interdisciplinary PerspectivesVol. 29
Amherst College (US), University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
0.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Which impacts matter for pavement management decisions? Quantifying social sustainability based on a capability approach — Jessica Boakye, Egemen Okte · Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS