Effect of functionalized graphene on mechanical and rheological properties of melt processed polyamide 6 nanocomposites

Abstract Nanocomposites of functionalized graphene (FG) and polyamide 6 (PA6) were prepared through the twin‐screw extrusion method by the routes of solution‐assisted masterbatch technique and dry mixing of nanomaterials with the virgin polymer. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X‐ray diffractometry (XRD), Raman spectroscopy, Rheological analysis, and tensile tests were performed to determine the best nanocomposite manufacturing route. The dispersion state proved to be the best for the 1 wt% FG/PA6 nanocomposite (1‐FG) prepared by the dry mixing method based on the characterization and analysis methods performed. Tensile properties were noticeably improved for the 1‐FG nanocomposite by 32.7% and 8.7% for Young's modulus and tensile strength, respectively. The presence of a network of nanomaterials was also spotted in SEM and rheological analysis. It was also found that the presence of trapped solvent molecules for the masterbatch solution method resulted in altered tensile properties and lowered rheological enhancements compared with its dry‐mixed counterparts. Raman spectroscopy was also proven capable of analyzing the degree of dispersion analogous to XRD or rheological analysis for the first time. Furthermore, the presence of vacuum degassing during the melt processing of nanocomposites was experimentally proven to be a must since FG particles get in‐situ reduced by the high temperature of the melt processing, resulting in the generation of gaseous species that critically sabotage melt processing in the absence of vacuum. Highlights Reduction of graphene in the melt processing sabotages the process. Vacuum degassing controls gaseous species generated due to graphene reduction. Dry mixing of materials proved to be better than the solution masterbatch method. Raman is capable of analyzing dispersion quality analogous to rheometric mechanical spectrometer (RMS) and XRD. In the solution masterbatch path, graphene retards solvent removal in degassing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Polymer Composites
Published
2024-12-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.29389
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Graphene research and applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.59
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of functionalized graphene on mechanical and rheological properties of melt processed polyamide 6 nanocomposites

Armin Gholizadeh, Amir Babaei, Mehdi Haji Abdolrasouli
5 citations
Polymer Composites
Graphene research and applications
0.59
article

Effect of functionalized graphene on mechanical and rheological properties of melt processed polyamide 6 nanocomposites

Armin Gholizadeh, Amir Babaei, Mehdi Haji Abdolrasouli
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Nanocomposites of functionalized graphene (FG) and polyamide 6 (PA6) were prepared through the twin‐screw extrusion method by the routes of solution‐assisted masterbatch technique and dry mixing of nanomaterials with the virgin polymer. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X‐ray diffractometry (XRD), Raman spectroscopy, Rheological analysis, and tensile tests were performed to determine the best nanocomposite manufacturing route. The dispersion state proved to be the best for the 1 wt% FG/PA6 nanocomposite (1‐FG) prepared by the dry mixing method based on the characterization and analysis methods performed. Tensile properties were noticeably improved for the 1‐FG nanocomposite by 32.7% and 8.7% for Young's modulus and tensile strength, respectively. The presence of a network of nanomaterials was also spotted in SEM and rheological analysis. It was also found that the presence of trapped solvent molecules for the masterbatch solution method resulted in altered tensile properties and lowered rheological enhancements compared with its dry‐mixed counterparts. Raman spectroscopy was also proven capable of analyzing the degree of dispersion analogous to XRD or rheological analysis for the first time. Furthermore, the presence of vacuum degassing during the melt processing of nanocomposites was experimentally proven to be a must since FG particles get in‐situ reduced by the high temperature of the melt processing, resulting in the generation of gaseous species that critically sabotage melt processing in the absence of vacuum. Highlights Reduction of graphene in the melt processing sabotages the process. Vacuum degassing controls gaseous species generated due to graphene reduction. Dry mixing of materials proved to be better than the solution masterbatch method. Raman is capable of analyzing dispersion quality analogous to rheometric mechanical spectrometer (RMS) and XRD. In the solution masterbatch path, graphene retards solvent removal in degassing.

Polymer CompositesVol. 46(7)
Golestan University (IR), University of Hormozgan (IR)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Graphene research and applications
0.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.