Dimensional calibration of small critical flow Venturi nozzles

A set of 14 Critical flow Venturi nozzles (CFVN) with nominal throat diameters of 1 mm and 2 mm but with different shapes and surface roughness were dimensionally calibrated using the METAS Coordinate Measuring Machine (CMM). A detailed analysis method using the raw data from the dimensional calibration was presented and compared to the reference value given by the dimensional calibration experts. Deviations ranging from less than 0.05 % to 0.24 % for throat diameters are observed, indicating that the analysis method affects the end result. Discrepancies are found due to form error. For such small CFVN, form error is the main contributor to the throat diameter uncertainty and therefore directly affects the end result of a dry calibration for such small nozzles. These CFVN were calibrated in nitrogen using two METAS flow standards over a Reynold number range from 6.5 ∙ 10 4 and 4.0 ∙ 10 5 with an expanded uncertainty of 0.15 % and 0.30 %, respectively. The agreement between predicted and measured discharge coefficients depends on the analysis method to determine the throat diameter. A trend favouring the alternative analysis method is observed but further analysis is needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Measurement Sensors
Published
2024-12-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measen.2024.101539
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.46
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dimensional calibration of small critical flow Venturi nozzles

Rémy Maury, M. A. de Huu, Marc MacDonald, Alain Küng et al.
1 citations
Measurement Sensors
Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
0.46
article

Dimensional calibration of small critical flow Venturi nozzles

Rémy Maury, M. A. de Huu, Marc MacDonald, Alain Küng, Marc Lochbrunner
article en
1 citations

Abstract

A set of 14 Critical flow Venturi nozzles (CFVN) with nominal throat diameters of 1 mm and 2 mm but with different shapes and surface roughness were dimensionally calibrated using the METAS Coordinate Measuring Machine (CMM). A detailed analysis method using the raw data from the dimensional calibration was presented and compared to the reference value given by the dimensional calibration experts. Deviations ranging from less than 0.05 % to 0.24 % for throat diameters are observed, indicating that the analysis method affects the end result. Discrepancies are found due to form error. For such small CFVN, form error is the main contributor to the throat diameter uncertainty and therefore directly affects the end result of a dry calibration for such small nozzles. These CFVN were calibrated in nitrogen using two METAS flow standards over a Reynold number range from 6.5 ∙ 10 4 and 4.0 ∙ 10 5 with an expanded uncertainty of 0.15 % and 0.30 %, respectively. The agreement between predicted and measured discharge coefficients depends on the analysis method to determine the throat diameter. A trend favouring the alternative analysis method is observed but further analysis is needed.

Measurement SensorsVol. 38
Swiss Federal Institute of Metrology (CH), TÜV SÜD (United Kingdom) (GB), Écologie et Biologie des Interactions (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
0.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.