Assessment of the lost cargo capacities of a container vessel when transitioning to alternative fuels

Abstract: Alternative fuels represent a viable solution to the decarbonization of the maritime industry. There are several options available with some technologies mature and ready to use. Other technologies are still under development; however, it is a certainty that alternative fuels and newer technologies could substitute conventional fuels. Changing to alternative fuels comes with a price. For cargo vessels, it is the loss of cargo space, due to the higher energy density of alternative fuels compared to fossil fuels. The present study calculates the cost of lost cargo when an 8000 TEU container vessel is burning methanol and ammonia. It is noted that additional cargo space required for methanol is 1674 m3, while for ammonia is 2277 m3. The cargo lost space has a significant impact on the earning potential of the vessel throughout its lifetime. Regardless of whether the owners choose a one-stop or two-stop approach, the owners must determine the frequency of bunkering based on the vessel's route and conduct a thorough review of the fuel tank capacity.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
AIN Journal
Published
2024-12-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59660/49140
Primary Topic
Maritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of the lost cargo capacities of a container vessel when transitioning to alternative fuels

Ghiorghe Batrinca, Livia Rauca
AIN Journal
Maritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency
article

Assessment of the lost cargo capacities of a container vessel when transitioning to alternative fuels

Ghiorghe Batrinca, Livia Rauca
article en

Abstract

Abstract: Alternative fuels represent a viable solution to the decarbonization of the maritime industry. There are several options available with some technologies mature and ready to use. Other technologies are still under development; however, it is a certainty that alternative fuels and newer technologies could substitute conventional fuels. Changing to alternative fuels comes with a price. For cargo vessels, it is the loss of cargo space, due to the higher energy density of alternative fuels compared to fossil fuels. The present study calculates the cost of lost cargo when an 8000 TEU container vessel is burning methanol and ammonia. It is noted that additional cargo space required for methanol is 1674 m3, while for ammonia is 2277 m3. The cargo lost space has a significant impact on the earning potential of the vessel throughout its lifetime. Regardless of whether the owners choose a one-stop or two-stop approach, the owners must determine the frequency of bunkering based on the vessel's route and conduct a thorough review of the fuel tank capacity.

AIN JournalVol. 49(1)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Maritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.