Effectiveness Of Traditional Balance Training Versus Dynadisc Balance Training OnSports Performance In Recreational Badminton Players

Introduction: Balance is vital for badminton performance, influencing stability, agility, and athleticism.Both traditional balance training and Dynadisc training enhance balance through perturbations that improve neuromuscular capabilities, readiness, and reaction times.To the best of our knowledge, there is a notable lack of comparative studies among Indian players; thus, assessing the effectiveness of these two training methods is crucial for developing optimal training strategies in the sport.Objective: The objective of this study is to investigate the effects of traditional balance training and Dynadisc balance training on badminton players.Additionally, it aims to compare the effectiveness of the traditional balance training program with the Dynadisc balance training approach.Methodology: Thirty patients were divided into two groups: one received traditional balance training, while the other underwent Dynadisc training.A pre-post analysis was conducted on the data collected after 8 weeks of training, and the results were subjected to statistical analysis using SPSS version 20 software.Results: Within-group analyses for Group A (traditional balance training) and Group B (Dynadisc training) revealed statistically significant improvements across all outcome measures.The Traditional Balance Test produced p-values of A = 0.0227 and B < 0.0001.Both Y Balance Tests showed significant results (A < 0.0001, B < 0.0001), while the Hexagon Agility Test and sports performance outcomes yielded A = 0.0325, B = 0.0002, and A = 0.0146, B = 0.0002, respectively.Notably, the Hexagon Agility Test (p = 0.0012) and sports performance (p = 0.051) were the only assessments that did not demonstrate statistical significance.Conclusion: The study concluded that while both traditional balance training and Dynadisc training equally improved balance, agility, and sports performance measures, Dynadisc demonstrated significantly greater improvements in agility and sports performance compared to traditional balance training.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
African Journal of Biomedical Research
Published
2024-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53555/ajbr.v27i4s.5447
Primary Topic
Sports and Physical Education Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectiveness Of Traditional Balance Training Versus Dynadisc Balance Training OnSports Performance In Recreational Badminton Players

Arundhati Nimbalkar
African Journal of Biomedical Research
Sports and Physical Education Research
article

Effectiveness Of Traditional Balance Training Versus Dynadisc Balance Training OnSports Performance In Recreational Badminton Players

Arundhati Nimbalkar
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Balance is vital for badminton performance, influencing stability, agility, and athleticism.Both traditional balance training and Dynadisc training enhance balance through perturbations that improve neuromuscular capabilities, readiness, and reaction times.To the best of our knowledge, there is a notable lack of comparative studies among Indian players; thus, assessing the effectiveness of these two training methods is crucial for developing optimal training strategies in the sport.Objective: The objective of this study is to investigate the effects of traditional balance training and Dynadisc balance training on badminton players.Additionally, it aims to compare the effectiveness of the traditional balance training program with the Dynadisc balance training approach.Methodology: Thirty patients were divided into two groups: one received traditional balance training, while the other underwent Dynadisc training.A pre-post analysis was conducted on the data collected after 8 weeks of training, and the results were subjected to statistical analysis using SPSS version 20 software.Results: Within-group analyses for Group A (traditional balance training) and Group B (Dynadisc training) revealed statistically significant improvements across all outcome measures.The Traditional Balance Test produced p-values of A = 0.0227 and B < 0.0001.Both Y Balance Tests showed significant results (A < 0.0001, B < 0.0001), while the Hexagon Agility Test and sports performance outcomes yielded A = 0.0325, B = 0.0002, and A = 0.0146, B = 0.0002, respectively.Notably, the Hexagon Agility Test (p = 0.0012) and sports performance (p = 0.051) were the only assessments that did not demonstrate statistical significance.Conclusion: The study concluded that while both traditional balance training and Dynadisc training equally improved balance, agility, and sports performance measures, Dynadisc demonstrated significantly greater improvements in agility and sports performance compared to traditional balance training.

African Journal of Biomedical Research
Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Sports and Physical Education Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.