Challenges of Relationship with Supervisor: Perspective of PhD Students

Background. The study investigates PhD student-supervisor relationship as a key element of postgraduate training of scientific workforce. Both sides of academic process should efficiently cooperate in order to successfully complete dissertation, develop research skills and professional competences in PhD students. Despite its great importance, in practice the relationship often faces various barriers significantly complicating scientific activity and affecting emotional component. Objective. To analyze the key factors determining the efficiency of PhD student-supervisor relationship. Materials and methods. The authors used the results of pilot studies conducted in 2024: “Challenges of relationship between PhD students (individual PhD students) and supervisors” (questionnaire survey, sample of 244 people) and “Neural network in science. For or against” (questionnaire survey, sample of 228 people). Results. The main barriers in relationship were identified: irregular communication, lack of clear expectations, disagreements in research approaches, overburdened supervisors and lack of research training among PhD students. These factors not only slow down the performance of scientific tasks, but also reduce the likelihood of a successful dissertation defense. Recommendations were given to improve PhD studentsupervisor relationship. Most attention is paid to the need for regular and constructive communication, a clear coordination of expectations and tasks, an individual approach and improvement of digital literacy among the participants of academic process. The authors emphasize that an integrated approach of eliminating barriers and effectively using modern technologies improves the quality of scientific personnel training and strengthens scientific potential.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
City Healthcare
Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47619/2713-2617.zm.2024.v.5i4p1;187-196
Primary Topic
Coaching Methods and Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Challenges of Relationship with Supervisor: Perspective of PhD Students

Polina I. Ananchenkova, Mikhail Yu. Kuznetsov, E. V. Malinovich
City Healthcare
Coaching Methods and Impact
article

Challenges of Relationship with Supervisor: Perspective of PhD Students

Polina I. Ananchenkova, Mikhail Yu. Kuznetsov, E. V. Malinovich
article en

Abstract

Background. The study investigates PhD student-supervisor relationship as a key element of postgraduate training of scientific workforce. Both sides of academic process should efficiently cooperate in order to successfully complete dissertation, develop research skills and professional competences in PhD students. Despite its great importance, in practice the relationship often faces various barriers significantly complicating scientific activity and affecting emotional component. Objective. To analyze the key factors determining the efficiency of PhD student-supervisor relationship. Materials and methods. The authors used the results of pilot studies conducted in 2024: “Challenges of relationship between PhD students (individual PhD students) and supervisors” (questionnaire survey, sample of 244 people) and “Neural network in science. For or against” (questionnaire survey, sample of 228 people). Results. The main barriers in relationship were identified: irregular communication, lack of clear expectations, disagreements in research approaches, overburdened supervisors and lack of research training among PhD students. These factors not only slow down the performance of scientific tasks, but also reduce the likelihood of a successful dissertation defense. Recommendations were given to improve PhD studentsupervisor relationship. Most attention is paid to the need for regular and constructive communication, a clear coordination of expectations and tasks, an individual approach and improvement of digital literacy among the participants of academic process. The authors emphasize that an integrated approach of eliminating barriers and effectively using modern technologies improves the quality of scientific personnel training and strengthens scientific potential.

City HealthcareVol. 5(4)
Scientific Research Institute of Healthcare Organization and Medical Management (RU), National Research Institute of Public Health named after N.A. Semashko (RU)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Coaching Methods and Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.