Expanding scenario diversity in prospective LCA: Coupling the TIAM-UCL integrated assessment model with Premise and ecoinvent

Prospective life cycle assessment (pLCA) using scenarios from integrated assessment models (IAMs) can explore future environmental impacts. However, results are sensitive to the IAM used and only scenarios from two IAMs – REMIND and IMAGE – have been soft-coupled with pLCA using Premise. Here, we establish a new linkage to a third IAM - TIAM-UCL - which diversifies available IAM scenarios and strengthens potential conclusions from pLCA. Over 200 variables across 16 global regions were linked to over 300 LCA processes, representing future technological changes across seven major sectors, including electricity, fuels, and steel. We analyse the future life-cycle impacts of the global electricity mix per kWh delivered to low-voltage consumers using TIAM-UCL scenarios, ecoinvent v3.9.1, and the EF 3.1 impact assessment method. In 1.5–2.0 °C futures, projected reductions in climate change impact from fossil-fuel phase-out have substantial co-benefits in ten categories, such as acidification reducing over 90 % by 2050. Trade-offs are found in five categories, such as critical material shortages. Comparing pLCA results based on all three IAM models showed consistent reductions in climate change impact to meet 1.5–2.0 °C futures. However, differences in other impact category results arose due to variations in low-carbon technologies deployed, such as IMAGE showing smaller environmental co-benefits due to preferences for CCS-fitted fossil generation, while REMIND had increased land use from greater solar uptake. Therefore, it is essential to consider the influence of IAM choice when interpreting pLCA outcomes. The addition of TIAM-UCL, now available in Premise, will enable more robust modelling of prospective environmental impacts. • New TIAM-UCL scenarios in Premise enhance scenario diversity in prospective LCA. • Decarbonising electricity reduces 10 life-cycle impacts but may add 5 trade-offs. • Comparing IAMs shows consistent life-cycle GWP reductions for 1.5–2.0 °C futures. • Environmental performance of decarbonised electricity varies across IAMs. • Diversity of IAMs in pLCA improves impact assessment of decarbonisation pathways.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Published
2024-12-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2024.115298
Citations
19
Primary Topic
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.91

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Expanding scenario diversity in prospective LCA: Coupling the TIAM-UCL integrated assessment model with Premise and ecoinvent

Christopher Vagg, Romain Sacchi, Joris Šimaitis, Isabela Butnar et al.
19 citations
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
3.91
article

Expanding scenario diversity in prospective LCA: Coupling the TIAM-UCL integrated assessment model with Premise and ecoinvent

Christopher Vagg, Romain Sacchi, Joris Šimaitis, Isabela Butnar, Rick Lupton, Stephen Allen
article en
19 citations

Abstract

Prospective life cycle assessment (pLCA) using scenarios from integrated assessment models (IAMs) can explore future environmental impacts. However, results are sensitive to the IAM used and only scenarios from two IAMs – REMIND and IMAGE – have been soft-coupled with pLCA using Premise. Here, we establish a new linkage to a third IAM - TIAM-UCL - which diversifies available IAM scenarios and strengthens potential conclusions from pLCA. Over 200 variables across 16 global regions were linked to over 300 LCA processes, representing future technological changes across seven major sectors, including electricity, fuels, and steel. We analyse the future life-cycle impacts of the global electricity mix per kWh delivered to low-voltage consumers using TIAM-UCL scenarios, ecoinvent v3.9.1, and the EF 3.1 impact assessment method. In 1.5–2.0 °C futures, projected reductions in climate change impact from fossil-fuel phase-out have substantial co-benefits in ten categories, such as acidification reducing over 90 % by 2050. Trade-offs are found in five categories, such as critical material shortages. Comparing pLCA results based on all three IAM models showed consistent reductions in climate change impact to meet 1.5–2.0 °C futures. However, differences in other impact category results arose due to variations in low-carbon technologies deployed, such as IMAGE showing smaller environmental co-benefits due to preferences for CCS-fitted fossil generation, while REMIND had increased land use from greater solar uptake. Therefore, it is essential to consider the influence of IAM choice when interpreting pLCA outcomes. The addition of TIAM-UCL, now available in Premise, will enable more robust modelling of prospective environmental impacts. • New TIAM-UCL scenarios in Premise enhance scenario diversity in prospective LCA. • Decarbonising electricity reduces 10 life-cycle impacts but may add 5 trade-offs. • Comparing IAMs shows consistent life-cycle GWP reductions for 1.5–2.0 °C futures. • Environmental performance of decarbonised electricity varies across IAMs. • Diversity of IAMs in pLCA improves impact assessment of decarbonisation pathways.

Renewable and Sustainable Energy ReviewsVol. 211
Paul Scherrer Institute (CH), Designability (GB), Centre for Sustainable Energy (GB), University College London (GB), University of Bath (GB)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
3.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.