A comparison of the accuracy and feasibility of a low‐cost mobile application versus higher‐cost handheld <scp>3D</scp> scanner for digital ear prosthetics
Mobile iPhone applications such as EM3D are a viable alternative to 3D handheld scanners such as EinScan. This study demonstrates reliable results in accuracy, and improved results in time, cost and operational feasibility.
Authors
- Rhea Darbari Kaul (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2945-6090)
- Sarah Whereat (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1933-5914)
- Payal Mukherjee (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1095-1566)
- Masako Dunn (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6379-2621)
- Kai Cheng (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6435-4375)
- Sophie Fleming
- Gordon G. Wallace (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0381-7273)
- Sepidar Sayyar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2736-4499)
- Jolande Ma (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5314-8274)
- Jonathan R. Clark (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1209-772X)
- Cindy Duong
Institutions
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- University of Wollongong (AU)
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (AU)
- Australian National Fabrication Facility (AU)
- Chris O’Brien Lifehouse (AU)
- ARC Centre of Excellence for Electromaterials Science (AU)
- Sydney Local Health District (AU)
- Macquarie University (AU)
Publication Details
- Journal
- ANZ Journal of Surgery
- Published
- 2024-12-27
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.19374
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.57