Calibration of an apparent electrical conductivity sensor using capacitance probes for determining soil water content

Abstract Soil apparent electrical conductivity (EC a ) measurements, although more suitable for soil salinity quantification, are often used to determine volumetric soil water content, θ v , in site‐specific crop management. Generally, the approach is to develop a field‐specific calibration function between EC a and measured θ v , θ v(m) . Such a calibration function is possible when soil water dominates EC a at a field. When this is not the case, θ v(m) data taken over time may be helpful to develop a function. Data regarding θ v(m) can be costly and time‐consuming as soil samples are needed to measure bulk density and gravimetric soil water. We postulate that capacitance probes, which measure scaled frequency (SF) as an indicator of the dielectric constant to estimate θ v , can be used to establish EC a ‐ θ v calibration functions. Capacitance probes that simultaneously provide temperature readings allow for EC a to be temperature‐corrected to 25°C, enabling development of EC a25 ‐ θ v calibration functions. A field experiment was set up to establish whether SF readings can be used to estimate θ v , θ v(SF) , in structured high montmorillonite clay soils accurately and determine if EC a25 ‐ θ v(SF) calibration functions are possible. Our results revealed that a single SF‐ θ v(m) calibration function representing 12 probes, or a specific soil form, is impossible. Each capacitance probe should be calibrated separately. The parameters for EC a25 ‐ θ v(m) calibration functions were like EC a25 ‐ θ v(SF) functions. The R 2 for EC a25 ‐ θ v(m) calibration functions was higher compared to the EC a25 ‐ θ v(SF) functions. Further investigation of using capacitance probes to estimate θ v for developing EC a ‐ θ v functions is needed before this approach can be applied confidently.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.20799
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.62
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Calibration of an apparent electrical conductivity sensor using capacitance probes for determining soil water content

L. D. van Rensburg, Johannes Hendrikus Barnard, C. C. du Preez, Judith Amarachukwu Edeh
3 citations
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing
0.62
article

Calibration of an apparent electrical conductivity sensor using capacitance probes for determining soil water content

L. D. van Rensburg, Johannes Hendrikus Barnard, C. C. du Preez, Judith Amarachukwu Edeh
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Soil apparent electrical conductivity (EC a ) measurements, although more suitable for soil salinity quantification, are often used to determine volumetric soil water content, θ v , in site‐specific crop management. Generally, the approach is to develop a field‐specific calibration function between EC a and measured θ v , θ v(m) . Such a calibration function is possible when soil water dominates EC a at a field. When this is not the case, θ v(m) data taken over time may be helpful to develop a function. Data regarding θ v(m) can be costly and time‐consuming as soil samples are needed to measure bulk density and gravimetric soil water. We postulate that capacitance probes, which measure scaled frequency (SF) as an indicator of the dielectric constant to estimate θ v , can be used to establish EC a ‐ θ v calibration functions. Capacitance probes that simultaneously provide temperature readings allow for EC a to be temperature‐corrected to 25°C, enabling development of EC a25 ‐ θ v calibration functions. A field experiment was set up to establish whether SF readings can be used to estimate θ v , θ v(SF) , in structured high montmorillonite clay soils accurately and determine if EC a25 ‐ θ v(SF) calibration functions are possible. Our results revealed that a single SF‐ θ v(m) calibration function representing 12 probes, or a specific soil form, is impossible. Each capacitance probe should be calibrated separately. The parameters for EC a25 ‐ θ v(m) calibration functions were like EC a25 ‐ θ v(SF) functions. The R 2 for EC a25 ‐ θ v(m) calibration functions was higher compared to the EC a25 ‐ θ v(SF) functions. Further investigation of using capacitance probes to estimate θ v for developing EC a ‐ θ v functions is needed before this approach can be applied confidently.

Soil Science Society of America JournalVol. 89(1)
University of the Free State (ZA)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing
0.62
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.