A note on Grigoriev and Zaitsev's system CNL^2_4

The present article examines a system of four-valued logic recently introduced by Oleg Grigoriev and Dmitry Zaitsev.In particular, besides other interesting results, we will clarify the connection of this system to related systems developed by Paul Ruet and Norihiro Kamide.By doing so, we discuss two philosophical problems that arise from making such connections quite explicit: first, there is an issue with how to make intelligible the meaning of the connectives and the nature of the truth values involved in the many-valued setting employed -what we have called 'the Haackian theme'.We argue that this can be done in a satisfactory way, when seen according to the classicist's light.Second, and related to the first problem, there is a complication arising from the fact that the proof system advanced may be made sense of by advancing at least four such different and incompatible readings -a sharpening of the so-called 'Carnap problem'.We make explicit how the problems connect with each other precisely and argue that what results is a kind of underdetermination by the deductive apparatus for the system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science
Published
2024-12-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4204/eptcs.415.20
Primary Topic
Quantum chaos and dynamical systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A note on Grigoriev and Zaitsev's system CNL^2_4

Hitoshi Omori, Jonas R. Becker Arenhart
Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science
Quantum chaos and dynamical systems
article

A note on Grigoriev and Zaitsev's system CNL^2_4

Hitoshi Omori, Jonas R. Becker Arenhart
article en

Abstract

The present article examines a system of four-valued logic recently introduced by Oleg Grigoriev and Dmitry Zaitsev.In particular, besides other interesting results, we will clarify the connection of this system to related systems developed by Paul Ruet and Norihiro Kamide.By doing so, we discuss two philosophical problems that arise from making such connections quite explicit: first, there is an issue with how to make intelligible the meaning of the connectives and the nature of the truth values involved in the many-valued setting employed -what we have called 'the Haackian theme'.We argue that this can be done in a satisfactory way, when seen according to the classicist's light.Second, and related to the first problem, there is a complication arising from the fact that the proof system advanced may be made sense of by advancing at least four such different and incompatible readings -a sharpening of the so-called 'Carnap problem'.We make explicit how the problems connect with each other precisely and argue that what results is a kind of underdetermination by the deductive apparatus for the system.

Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer ScienceVol. 415
Tohoku University (JP), Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (BR)
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Quantum chaos and dynamical systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A note on Grigoriev and Zaitsev's system CNL^2_4 — Hitoshi Omori, Jonas R. Becker Arenhart · Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS