A qualitative exploration of perioperative subjective experiences of colorectal cancer patients undergoing fast-track surgery

Colorectal cancer significantly impacts patient quality of life and burdens healthcare systems globally. Fast-track surgery (FTS) aims to alleviate some of these impacts by expediting recovery and reduce the physiological stress associated with traditional surgical approaches. Despite the clinical efficiency of FTS, there exists a gap in the literature concerning patients' subjective experiences during the perioperative period. This study seeks to fill that gap by qualitatively exploring the perioperative experiences of patients undergoing FTS for colorectal cancer, focusing on their emotional, psychological, and informational journeys. We purposively sampled 12 colorectal cancer patients. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analyzed using thematic analysis to uncover the emotional and psychological nuances of the patients' experiences. Findings revealed that patients often felt under-informed and overwhelmed, impacting their psychological preparedness and satisfaction with the surgery. Despite FTS' clinical benefits, patients reported mixed emotions post-surgery, including relief and ongoing anxiety about cancer recurrence. Our findings highlight the need for enhanced patient-centered care practices, suggesting that healthcare providers should integrate more effective preoperative education and support systems to better align clinical efficiency with patient satisfaction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2024-12-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-79944-5
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.29
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A qualitative exploration of perioperative subjective experiences of colorectal cancer patients undergoing fast-track surgery

Na Wang, Xianghua Zhang, Siping Long, Meng Zou et al.
4 citations
Scientific Reports
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
2.29
article

A qualitative exploration of perioperative subjective experiences of colorectal cancer patients undergoing fast-track surgery

Na Wang, Xianghua Zhang, Siping Long, Meng Zou, Jia Xu, Lan Zhang, Li Chen, Wei Wang, Xiaoting Zhang, Fang Chen, Haibin Wu, Chun Zeng
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Colorectal cancer significantly impacts patient quality of life and burdens healthcare systems globally. Fast-track surgery (FTS) aims to alleviate some of these impacts by expediting recovery and reduce the physiological stress associated with traditional surgical approaches. Despite the clinical efficiency of FTS, there exists a gap in the literature concerning patients' subjective experiences during the perioperative period. This study seeks to fill that gap by qualitatively exploring the perioperative experiences of patients undergoing FTS for colorectal cancer, focusing on their emotional, psychological, and informational journeys. We purposively sampled 12 colorectal cancer patients. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analyzed using thematic analysis to uncover the emotional and psychological nuances of the patients' experiences. Findings revealed that patients often felt under-informed and overwhelmed, impacting their psychological preparedness and satisfaction with the surgery. Despite FTS' clinical benefits, patients reported mixed emotions post-surgery, including relief and ongoing anxiety about cancer recurrence. Our findings highlight the need for enhanced patient-centered care practices, suggesting that healthcare providers should integrate more effective preoperative education and support systems to better align clinical efficiency with patient satisfaction.

Scientific ReportsVol. 14(1)
The University of Sydney (AU), Shenzhen Bao'an District People's Hospital (CN), Zhejiang University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
2.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.