Machine Learning in Brain Tumor Diagnosis: Assessing the Efficacy of Diverse Methods

Background: Brain tumors constitute a critical and potentially life-threatening condition that requires accurate and timely diagnosis. In recent years, machine learning (ML) approaches have emerged as powerful tools for assisting radiologists and clinicians in identifying and classifying tumors on medical imaging. While numerous ML methods, including conventional machine learning algorithms and deep learning-based models, have been explored, a comprehensive analysis of their efficacy in detecting, segmenting, and classifying brain tumors remains essential. Methods: We conducted a systematic evaluation of diverse ML methods used in brain tumor diagnosis. We first identified and collated relevant studies from major scientific databases, focusing on image-based applications such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The methods included pre-processing pipelines, feature extraction techniques, and both supervised and unsupervised learning approaches. We then compared these methods based on standard metrics, including accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and F1-score, to gain insights into their relative performance. Furthermore, we applied representative algorithms (such as support vector machines, convolutional neural networks, and random forests) to an open-access brain tumor imaging dataset to evaluate their performance and compare empirical findings. Results: Results indicated that deep learning models, particularly convolutional neural networks, consistently outperformed traditional ML models across various performance metrics. In particular, automated feature extraction in deep learning approaches proved pivotal in capturing nuanced information such as tumor shape and heterogeneity. Conventional algorithms still demonstrated merit when dataset sizes were limited or when computational resources were constrained. Additionally, various data augmentation techniques improved the robustness and generalizability of ML models in situations with scarce annotated data. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that deep learning-based methods hold the greatest potential for accurate and efficient brain tumor diagnosis, particularly when coupled with robust datasets and high-quality imaging. Nonetheless, careful selection of model architecture, training strategies, and validation protocols remains paramount to ensure reliable clinical translation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Power System Technology
Published
2024-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52783/pst.1272
Primary Topic
Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine Learning in Brain Tumor Diagnosis: Assessing the Efficacy of Diverse Methods

Mohammed A. Farooqui
Power System Technology
Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
article

Machine Learning in Brain Tumor Diagnosis: Assessing the Efficacy of Diverse Methods

Mohammed A. Farooqui
article en

Abstract

Background: Brain tumors constitute a critical and potentially life-threatening condition that requires accurate and timely diagnosis. In recent years, machine learning (ML) approaches have emerged as powerful tools for assisting radiologists and clinicians in identifying and classifying tumors on medical imaging. While numerous ML methods, including conventional machine learning algorithms and deep learning-based models, have been explored, a comprehensive analysis of their efficacy in detecting, segmenting, and classifying brain tumors remains essential. Methods: We conducted a systematic evaluation of diverse ML methods used in brain tumor diagnosis. We first identified and collated relevant studies from major scientific databases, focusing on image-based applications such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The methods included pre-processing pipelines, feature extraction techniques, and both supervised and unsupervised learning approaches. We then compared these methods based on standard metrics, including accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and F1-score, to gain insights into their relative performance. Furthermore, we applied representative algorithms (such as support vector machines, convolutional neural networks, and random forests) to an open-access brain tumor imaging dataset to evaluate their performance and compare empirical findings. Results: Results indicated that deep learning models, particularly convolutional neural networks, consistently outperformed traditional ML models across various performance metrics. In particular, automated feature extraction in deep learning approaches proved pivotal in capturing nuanced information such as tumor shape and heterogeneity. Conventional algorithms still demonstrated merit when dataset sizes were limited or when computational resources were constrained. Additionally, various data augmentation techniques improved the robustness and generalizability of ML models in situations with scarce annotated data. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that deep learning-based methods hold the greatest potential for accurate and efficient brain tumor diagnosis, particularly when coupled with robust datasets and high-quality imaging. Nonetheless, careful selection of model architecture, training strategies, and validation protocols remains paramount to ensure reliable clinical translation.

Power System TechnologyVol. 48(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.