The interplay between motor cost and self-efficacy related to walking across terrain in gaze and walking decisions

Motor behaviours, like where to step and which path to walk, rely on gaze shifts to gather visual information necessary to decide the next action. Factors influencing both gaze and walking decisions are poorly understood. Here we had people choose between two paths to determine how a person's belief in their ability to walk across different terrains (i.e., self-efficacy) competed with the expected cost of walking different lengths in deciding how to allocate gaze and the choice of path. When paths differed in both length and terrain, participants directed gaze progressively more to the longer path as self-efficacy about it increased and the difference in rating with the shorter path grew. Participants also chose the higher-rated path more frequently regardless of path length. These results demonstrate that self-efficacy contributes to gaze and walking decisions and suggest that it may play a more dominant role versus energetic cost in both behaviours.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2024-12-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-82185-1
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.34

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The interplay between motor cost and self-efficacy related to walking across terrain in gaze and walking decisions

Daniel S. Marigold, Vinicius da Eira Silva
1 citations
Scientific Reports
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
0.34
article

The interplay between motor cost and self-efficacy related to walking across terrain in gaze and walking decisions

Daniel S. Marigold, Vinicius da Eira Silva
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Motor behaviours, like where to step and which path to walk, rely on gaze shifts to gather visual information necessary to decide the next action. Factors influencing both gaze and walking decisions are poorly understood. Here we had people choose between two paths to determine how a person's belief in their ability to walk across different terrains (i.e., self-efficacy) competed with the expected cost of walking different lengths in deciding how to allocate gaze and the choice of path. When paths differed in both length and terrain, participants directed gaze progressively more to the longer path as self-efficacy about it increased and the difference in rating with the shorter path grew. Participants also chose the higher-rated path more frequently regardless of path length. These results demonstrate that self-efficacy contributes to gaze and walking decisions and suggest that it may play a more dominant role versus energetic cost in both behaviours.

Scientific ReportsVol. 14(1)
Simon Fraser University (CA)
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
0.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.