Material Use Efficiency of Primary Packaging of Fast‐Moving Consumer Goods

Abstract To make different packages with various filling quantities better comparable for their packaging material use, in this study the packaging material use efficiency was defined as the ratio of fill good amount to the packaging weight. Several hundred rigid packages (tubes, bottles, cans, and carton packages) for liquid and higher‐viscous fast‐moving consumer goods, e.g., beverages and personal care products, were analyzed (weight) and more than >1000 data sets were taken from packaging suppliers of glass and PET packaging. As expected, glass packaging is heavier than PET packaging by a factor of around 10, and with a higher filling volume less packaging per amount of food is required. The material use efficiency of glass and PET bottles can differ by up to a factor of 3 within one filling quantity. The results are relevant for calculating life cycle assessments (LCAs) and selection of material efficient packaging.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chemie Ingenieur Technik
Published
2024-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cite.202400013
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Consumer Packaging Perceptions and Trends
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.76
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Material Use Efficiency of Primary Packaging of Fast‐Moving Consumer Goods

Craig R. Tischler, Sven Sängerlaub, Cihat Yilmaz, Tanja Fell et al.
4 citations
Chemie Ingenieur Technik
Consumer Packaging Perceptions and Trends
1.76
article

Material Use Efficiency of Primary Packaging of Fast‐Moving Consumer Goods

Craig R. Tischler, Sven Sängerlaub, Cihat Yilmaz, Tanja Fell, Konstantin Schinkel, Teresa Rohrmeier, Kajetan Müller, Laura Blanke, Verena Dorn, Maryam Vafaieshoar
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract To make different packages with various filling quantities better comparable for their packaging material use, in this study the packaging material use efficiency was defined as the ratio of fill good amount to the packaging weight. Several hundred rigid packages (tubes, bottles, cans, and carton packages) for liquid and higher‐viscous fast‐moving consumer goods, e.g., beverages and personal care products, were analyzed (weight) and more than >1000 data sets were taken from packaging suppliers of glass and PET packaging. As expected, glass packaging is heavier than PET packaging by a factor of around 10, and with a higher filling volume less packaging per amount of food is required. The material use efficiency of glass and PET bottles can differ by up to a factor of 3 within one filling quantity. The results are relevant for calculating life cycle assessments (LCAs) and selection of material efficient packaging.

Chemie Ingenieur TechnikVol. 97(4)
Munich University of Applied Sciences (DE), Kempten University of Applied Sciences (DE), Fraunhofer Institute for Process Engineering and Packaging (DE), Zero to Three (US)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Consumer Packaging Perceptions and Trends
1.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.