Tinjauan Yuridis Putusan Hakim Mengenai Perbuatan Melawan Hukum dalam Sangketa Pertanahan Pada Putusan Kasasi Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4655 K/PDT/2023

The Supreme Court's decision in Case No. 4655 K/Pdt/2023, which involves a land ownership dispute between PT Sarana Subur Agrindotama and H. Muhammad Noor alias Amat Iras, serves as an important reference in the development of agrarian law, particularly regarding the ownership of Right to Cultivate (HGU) certificates in Indonesia. This dispute addresses unlawful conduct in the form of land control that is inconsistent with applicable legal principles, specifically regulated in Article 1365 of the Indonesian Civil Code (KUHPer). Through an analysis of legal considerations and presented evidence, the Supreme Court decisively ruled on the rights and ownership boundaries involving HGU and individual rights to land. This article explores the implications of this decision, including its impact on legal protection for HGU holders and community rights to land, and examines the decision's influence on future land management in Indonesia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ranah Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development
Published
2024-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.38035/rrj.v7i2.1296
Primary Topic
Legal Studies and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tinjauan Yuridis Putusan Hakim Mengenai Perbuatan Melawan Hukum dalam Sangketa Pertanahan Pada Putusan Kasasi Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4655 K/PDT/2023

Dhiny Ellen Juwita, Nathania Apriza, Talitha Inas Tsabitah, Andryawan Andryawan et al.
Ranah Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development
Legal Studies and Policies
article

Tinjauan Yuridis Putusan Hakim Mengenai Perbuatan Melawan Hukum dalam Sangketa Pertanahan Pada Putusan Kasasi Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4655 K/PDT/2023

Dhiny Ellen Juwita, Nathania Apriza, Talitha Inas Tsabitah, Andryawan Andryawan, Yoel Calvianson, Fryana Satriani
article en

Abstract

The Supreme Court's decision in Case No. 4655 K/Pdt/2023, which involves a land ownership dispute between PT Sarana Subur Agrindotama and H. Muhammad Noor alias Amat Iras, serves as an important reference in the development of agrarian law, particularly regarding the ownership of Right to Cultivate (HGU) certificates in Indonesia. This dispute addresses unlawful conduct in the form of land control that is inconsistent with applicable legal principles, specifically regulated in Article 1365 of the Indonesian Civil Code (KUHPer). Through an analysis of legal considerations and presented evidence, the Supreme Court decisively ruled on the rights and ownership boundaries involving HGU and individual rights to land. This article explores the implications of this decision, including its impact on legal protection for HGU holders and community rights to land, and examines the decision's influence on future land management in Indonesia.

Ranah Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and DevelopmentVol. 7(2)
Tarumanagara University (ID)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Legal Studies and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.