Prediction of GNSS Velocity Accuracies Using Machine Learning Algorithms for Active Fault Slip Rate Determination and Earthquake Hazard Assessment

GNSS technology utilizes satellite signals to determine the position of a point on Earth. Using this location information, the GNSS velocities of the points can be calculated. GNSS velocity accuracies are crucial for studies requiring high precision, as fault slip rates typically range within a few millimeters per year. This study employs machine learning (ML) algorithms to predict GNSS velocity accuracies for fault slip rate estimation and earthquake hazard analysis. GNSS data from four CORS stations collected over 1-, 2-, and 3-year intervals with observation durations of 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 h, were analyzed to generate velocity estimates. Position accuracies, observation intervals, and corresponding velocity accuracies formed two datasets for the East and North components. ML models, including Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, K-Nearest Neighbors, and Multiple Linear Regression, were used to model the relationship between position and velocity accuracies. The findings reveal that the Random Forest, which makes more accurate and reliable predictions by evaluating many decision trees together, achieved over 90% accuracy for both components. Velocity accuracies of ±1.3 mm/year were obtained for 1-year interval data, while accuracies of ±0.6 mm/year were achieved for the 2- and 3-year intervals. Three campaigns were deemed sufficient for Holocene faults with higher slip rates. However, for Quaternary faults with lower slip rates, longer observation periods or additional campaigns are necessary to ensure reliable velocity estimates. This highlights the need for GNSS observation planning based on fault activity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app15010113
Citations
4
Primary Topic
earthquake and tectonic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.14
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prediction of GNSS Velocity Accuracies Using Machine Learning Algorithms for Active Fault Slip Rate Determination and Earthquake Hazard Assessment

Halil İbrahim Solak
4 citations
Applied Sciences
earthquake and tectonic studies
2.14
article

Prediction of GNSS Velocity Accuracies Using Machine Learning Algorithms for Active Fault Slip Rate Determination and Earthquake Hazard Assessment

Halil İbrahim Solak
article en
4 citations

Abstract

GNSS technology utilizes satellite signals to determine the position of a point on Earth. Using this location information, the GNSS velocities of the points can be calculated. GNSS velocity accuracies are crucial for studies requiring high precision, as fault slip rates typically range within a few millimeters per year. This study employs machine learning (ML) algorithms to predict GNSS velocity accuracies for fault slip rate estimation and earthquake hazard analysis. GNSS data from four CORS stations collected over 1-, 2-, and 3-year intervals with observation durations of 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 h, were analyzed to generate velocity estimates. Position accuracies, observation intervals, and corresponding velocity accuracies formed two datasets for the East and North components. ML models, including Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, K-Nearest Neighbors, and Multiple Linear Regression, were used to model the relationship between position and velocity accuracies. The findings reveal that the Random Forest, which makes more accurate and reliable predictions by evaluating many decision trees together, achieved over 90% accuracy for both components. Velocity accuracies of ±1.3 mm/year were obtained for 1-year interval data, while accuracies of ±0.6 mm/year were achieved for the 2- and 3-year intervals. Three campaigns were deemed sufficient for Holocene faults with higher slip rates. However, for Quaternary faults with lower slip rates, longer observation periods or additional campaigns are necessary to ensure reliable velocity estimates. This highlights the need for GNSS observation planning based on fault activity.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(1)
Afyon Kocatepe University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
earthquake and tectonic studies
2.14
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.