What to Do with “Other, Describe”

Measuring social categories and phenomena in survey questionnaires is complicated in a dynamic and diverse society. The use of “other, describe”–style open-ended text boxes can address this issue, but researchers rarely use these data because they lack guidance on how to code open-text information and manage small samples for analyses. The authors offer a roadmap to key decisions regarding the use of “other, describe” answer options and data during three stages of research: data collection and instrument development, data cleaning, and data analysis. The authors then use two cases, the Perceptions of Housework Pilot Survey and the Perceptions of Discrimination Study, to illustrate how decision making about open-text responses to demographic survey questions unfolded. These cases highlight the complexities and trade-offs in decision making and their implications for knowledge production. The authors recommend meta-practices for flexibility, transparency, and reflexivity, as there is not one “right choice” when it comes to using “other, describe” data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sociological Methodology
Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00811750241304774
Citations
5
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.22
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What to Do with “Other, Describe”

D’Lane R. Compton, Katie Donnelly Moran, Lauren Valentino, Christina Pao et al.
5 citations
Sociological Methodology
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
3.22
article

What to Do with “Other, Describe”

D’Lane R. Compton, Katie Donnelly Moran, Lauren Valentino, Christina Pao, Jaclyn S. Wong, Gayle Kaufman
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Measuring social categories and phenomena in survey questionnaires is complicated in a dynamic and diverse society. The use of “other, describe”–style open-ended text boxes can address this issue, but researchers rarely use these data because they lack guidance on how to code open-text information and manage small samples for analyses. The authors offer a roadmap to key decisions regarding the use of “other, describe” answer options and data during three stages of research: data collection and instrument development, data cleaning, and data analysis. The authors then use two cases, the Perceptions of Housework Pilot Survey and the Perceptions of Discrimination Study, to illustrate how decision making about open-text responses to demographic survey questions unfolded. These cases highlight the complexities and trade-offs in decision making and their implications for knowledge production. The authors recommend meta-practices for flexibility, transparency, and reflexivity, as there is not one “right choice” when it comes to using “other, describe” data.

Sociological MethodologyVol. 55(2)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Davidson College (US), University of New Orleans (US), Princeton University (US), Clinical Research Associates (US)
Reduced inequalities, Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
3.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.