Chemical Profiling, Insecticidal and Enzyme Inhibition Activities of <i>Rosmarinus officinalis</i> and <i>Ocimum sanctum</i> Against Aphid, Mealy Bug and Diamondback Moth

ABSTRACT Aphis craccivora Koch (Hemiptera: Aphididae), Planococcus lilacinus Cockrell (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) and Plutella xylostella L. (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) are key pests of agricultural and horticultural crops. Indiscriminate use of insecticides led to resistance, harmful to beneficial insects and environment. Essential oils (EOs) are plant‐derived secondary metabolites that can be used to combat insect pests. In this work, chemical composition and insecticidal activities of EOs were screened against target pests for identification of lead(s). GC and GC–mass spectra (MS) analysis of EOs revealed that ocimene (36.4%) in Rosmarinus officinalis L. (Lamiaceae) and β‐caryophyllene (58.77%) in Ocimum sanctum L. (Lamiaceae) were major constituents. Combination of R. officinalis + O. sanctum (RO + OS) at 1:1, 3:1 and 1:3 ratios comprised eugenol (36.95%, 42.02% and 19.01%, respectively) as the main constituent. R. officinalis is most effective against A. craccivora and P. lilacinus (LD 50 = 0.97 and 2.02 µL/insect, respectively) after 96 h. O. sanctum was more effective against P . xylostella (LD 50 = 3.92 µL/insect). All the combinations of EOs displayed toxicity (LD 50 = 0.11–0.14 µL/insect), synergistic activity for A. craccivora and P. lilacinus , whereas P. xylostella showed antagonistic activity. Further RO + OS at 1:3 and 3:1 ratios also displayed high toxicity to P. lilacinus (LD 50 = 0.36–0.40 µL/insect) and P. xylostella (LD 50 = 1.36–1.49 µL/insect). EO of R. officinalis showed repellent (RC 50 = 2366.62 µL/L) against P. xylostella , deterrent activity of O. sanctum against A. craccivora (88%) and synergistic action against A. craccivora (Cotoxicity coefficient (CTC) = 640.67–1366.67) and P. lilacinus (CTC = 404–561.11). Both EOs showed inhibition of acetylcholinesterase (AChE), glutathione‐ S ‐transferase (GST), CES1 and mixed‐function oxidase (MFO) in test insects. The EO of RO and OS alone or in combination may be recommended for the control of target pests based on field bio‐efficacy studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chemistry & Biodiversity
Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cbdv.202402647
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Insect Pest Control Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Chemical Profiling, Insecticidal and Enzyme Inhibition Activities of Rosmarinus officinalis and Ocimum sanctum Against Aphid, Mealy Bug and Diamondback Moth

S. G. Eswara Reddy, Urvashi Kashyap
4 citations
Chemistry & Biodiversity
Insect Pest Control Strategies
2.40
article

Chemical Profiling, Insecticidal and Enzyme Inhibition Activities of Rosmarinus officinalis and Ocimum sanctum Against Aphid, Mealy Bug and Diamondback Moth

S. G. Eswara Reddy, Urvashi Kashyap
article en
4 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aphis craccivora Koch (Hemiptera: Aphididae), Planococcus lilacinus Cockrell (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) and Plutella xylostella L. (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) are key pests of agricultural and horticultural crops. Indiscriminate use of insecticides led to resistance, harmful to beneficial insects and environment. Essential oils (EOs) are plant‐derived secondary metabolites that can be used to combat insect pests. In this work, chemical composition and insecticidal activities of EOs were screened against target pests for identification of lead(s). GC and GC–mass spectra (MS) analysis of EOs revealed that ocimene (36.4%) in Rosmarinus officinalis L. (Lamiaceae) and β‐caryophyllene (58.77%) in Ocimum sanctum L. (Lamiaceae) were major constituents. Combination of R. officinalis + O. sanctum (RO + OS) at 1:1, 3:1 and 1:3 ratios comprised eugenol (36.95%, 42.02% and 19.01%, respectively) as the main constituent. R. officinalis is most effective against A. craccivora and P. lilacinus (LD 50 = 0.97 and 2.02 µL/insect, respectively) after 96 h. O. sanctum was more effective against P . xylostella (LD 50 = 3.92 µL/insect). All the combinations of EOs displayed toxicity (LD 50 = 0.11–0.14 µL/insect), synergistic activity for A. craccivora and P. lilacinus , whereas P. xylostella showed antagonistic activity. Further RO + OS at 1:3 and 3:1 ratios also displayed high toxicity to P. lilacinus (LD 50 = 0.36–0.40 µL/insect) and P. xylostella (LD 50 = 1.36–1.49 µL/insect). EO of R. officinalis showed repellent (RC 50 = 2366.62 µL/L) against P. xylostella , deterrent activity of O. sanctum against A. craccivora (88%) and synergistic action against A. craccivora (Cotoxicity coefficient (CTC) = 640.67–1366.67) and P. lilacinus (CTC = 404–561.11). Both EOs showed inhibition of acetylcholinesterase (AChE), glutathione‐ S ‐transferase (GST), CES1 and mixed‐function oxidase (MFO) in test insects. The EO of RO and OS alone or in combination may be recommended for the control of target pests based on field bio‐efficacy studies.

Chemistry & BiodiversityVol. 22(5)
Central Institute of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants (IN), Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (IN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Insect Pest Control Strategies
2.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.