Exact NNLO corrections vs K-factors in PDF fits

Parton distribution functions (PDFs) often include datasets corresponding to processes whereby the theoretical predictions at next-to-next-to-leading order (NNLO) in peturbative QCD have to be approximated, and this approximation may be performed using K-factors, which in turn depend on the PDF set used to compute them. In this study, we investigate the impact of K-factors produced with various PDF sets, namely CT18, MSHT20 and NNPDF4.0 on (differential) cross sections of top pair production at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). Furthermore, we perform a new fit (otherwise analogous to NNPDF4.0 with MHOUs) where the exact NNLO corrections are used in the fitting procedure and compare the K-factors obtained from this fit with those obtained from the above mentioned PDF sets. We find good agreement amongst K-factors obtained from these different PDF sets.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22323/1.469.0043
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Numerical Methods and Algorithms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.36
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exact NNLO corrections vs K-factors in PDF fits

Tanishq Sharma
1 citations
Numerical Methods and Algorithms
0.36
article

Exact NNLO corrections vs K-factors in PDF fits

Tanishq Sharma
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Parton distribution functions (PDFs) often include datasets corresponding to processes whereby the theoretical predictions at next-to-next-to-leading order (NNLO) in peturbative QCD have to be approximated, and this approximation may be performed using K-factors, which in turn depend on the PDF set used to compute them. In this study, we investigate the impact of K-factors produced with various PDF sets, namely CT18, MSHT20 and NNPDF4.0 on (differential) cross sections of top pair production at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). Furthermore, we perform a new fit (otherwise analogous to NNPDF4.0 with MHOUs) where the exact NNLO corrections are used in the fitting procedure and compare the K-factors obtained from this fit with those obtained from the above mentioned PDF sets. We find good agreement amongst K-factors obtained from these different PDF sets.

Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Numerical Methods and Algorithms
0.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.