A study of systematic uncertainties within the MSHT PDF framework.

Experimental errors are now incredibly precise, and are often dominated by the systematic uncertainties. Therefore the errors obtained in the Parton Distribution Functions that are extracted from this data will also be dominated by these experimental systematic errors, as well as the systematic errors embedded in the theoretical calculations. However, as is well known, there are often significant uncertainties in these systematic errors, and so to determine precisely the errors in the Parton Distribution Functions, we need to be thoughtful about the uncertainties in the errors themselves. In this paper, we discuss an approach where these "errors on errors" can be incorporated into a ๐œ’2 calculation, and investigate how such a model behaves and what it tells us about the resulting errors. Also we look at two data sets, ATLAS W,Z Data [3] and the ATLAS 7 TeV Inclusive Jet Distribution Data [4] and investigate the information that this model implies about these two data sets.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22323/1.469.0059
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A study of systematic uncertainties within the MSHT PDF framework.

Matthew Reader
1 citations
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
0.49
article

A study of systematic uncertainties within the MSHT PDF framework.

Matthew Reader
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Experimental errors are now incredibly precise, and are often dominated by the systematic uncertainties. Therefore the errors obtained in the Parton Distribution Functions that are extracted from this data will also be dominated by these experimental systematic errors, as well as the systematic errors embedded in the theoretical calculations. However, as is well known, there are often significant uncertainties in these systematic errors, and so to determine precisely the errors in the Parton Distribution Functions, we need to be thoughtful about the uncertainties in the errors themselves. In this paper, we discuss an approach where these "errors on errors" can be incorporated into a ๐œ’2 calculation, and investigate how such a model behaves and what it tells us about the resulting errors. Also we look at two data sets, ATLAS W,Z Data [3] and the ATLAS 7 TeV Inclusive Jet Distribution Data [4] and investigate the information that this model implies about these two data sets.

Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
0.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A study of systematic uncertainties within the MSHT PDF framework. โ€” Matthew Reader ยท (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS