Quantitative Physiologic MRI Combined with Feature Engineering for Developing Machine Learning-Based Prediction Models to Distinguish Glioblastomas from Single Brain Metastases

<b>Background</b>: The accurate and early distinction of glioblastomas (GBMs) from single brain metastases (BMs) provides a window of opportunity for reframing treatment strategies enabling optimal and timely therapeutic interventions. We sought to leverage physiologically sensitive parameters derived from diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC)-perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI) along with machine learning-based methods to distinguish GBMs from single BMs. <b>Methods</b>: Patients with histopathology-confirmed GBMs (<i>n</i> = 62) and BMs (<i>n</i> = 26) and exhibiting contrast-enhancing regions (CERs) underwent 3T anatomical imaging, DTI and DSC-PWI prior to treatment. Median values of mean diffusivity (MD), fractional anisotropy, linear, planar and spheric anisotropic coefficients, and relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) and maximum rCBV values were measured from CERs and immediate peritumor regions. Data normalization and scaling were performed. In the next step, most relevant features were extracted (non-interacting features), which were subsequently used to generate a set of new, innovative, high-order features (interacting features) using a feature engineering method. Finally, 10 machine learning classifiers were employed in distinguishing GBMs and BMs. Cross-validation and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to determine the diagnostic performance. <b>Results</b>: A random forest classifier with ANOVA F-value feature selection algorithm using both interacting and non-interacting features provided the best diagnostic performance in distinguishing GBMs from BMs with an area under the ROC curve of 92.67%, a classification accuracy of 87.8%, a sensitivity of 73.64% and a specificity of 97.5%. <b>Conclusions</b>: A machine learning based approach involving the combined use of interacting and non-interacting physiological MRI parameters shows promise to differentiate between GBMs and BMs with high accuracy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15010038
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantitative Physiologic MRI Combined with Feature Engineering for Developing Machine Learning-Based Prediction Models to Distinguish Glioblastomas from Single Brain Metastases

Laurie A. Loevner, Sanjeev Chawla, Steven Brem, Sourav Bhaduri et al.
1 citations
Diagnostics
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
0.40
article

Quantitative Physiologic MRI Combined with Feature Engineering for Developing Machine Learning-Based Prediction Models to Distinguish Glioblastomas from Single Brain Metastases

Laurie A. Loevner, Sanjeev Chawla, Steven Brem, Sourav Bhaduri, Brandon Hall, Seyyed Ali Hosseini, Stijn Servaes, Suyash Mohan, Archith Rajan, Pedro Rosa‐Neto
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: The accurate and early distinction of glioblastomas (GBMs) from single brain metastases (BMs) provides a window of opportunity for reframing treatment strategies enabling optimal and timely therapeutic interventions. We sought to leverage physiologically sensitive parameters derived from diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC)-perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI) along with machine learning-based methods to distinguish GBMs from single BMs. <b>Methods</b>: Patients with histopathology-confirmed GBMs (<i>n</i> = 62) and BMs (<i>n</i> = 26) and exhibiting contrast-enhancing regions (CERs) underwent 3T anatomical imaging, DTI and DSC-PWI prior to treatment. Median values of mean diffusivity (MD), fractional anisotropy, linear, planar and spheric anisotropic coefficients, and relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) and maximum rCBV values were measured from CERs and immediate peritumor regions. Data normalization and scaling were performed. In the next step, most relevant features were extracted (non-interacting features), which were subsequently used to generate a set of new, innovative, high-order features (interacting features) using a feature engineering method. Finally, 10 machine learning classifiers were employed in distinguishing GBMs and BMs. Cross-validation and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to determine the diagnostic performance. <b>Results</b>: A random forest classifier with ANOVA F-value feature selection algorithm using both interacting and non-interacting features provided the best diagnostic performance in distinguishing GBMs from BMs with an area under the ROC curve of 92.67%, a classification accuracy of 87.8%, a sensitivity of 73.64% and a specificity of 97.5%. <b>Conclusions</b>: A machine learning based approach involving the combined use of interacting and non-interacting physiological MRI parameters shows promise to differentiate between GBMs and BMs with high accuracy.

DiagnosticsVol. 15(1)
Douglas Mental Health University Institute (CA), McGill University (CA), University of Pennsylvania (US), Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
0.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.