RAT Association’s Structure: Measuring Fluency and Flexibility of Thinking

<p>The Remote Association Test (RAT) or Mednick's task is used to assess creative thinking and investigate insight. Despite various modifications of RAT (CRAT, fRAT, vRAT, LI-RAT) and their adaptations in different languages, the problem of heterogeneity of the association structure remains unsolved. The purpose of this paper is to analyze papers devoted to association structure heterogeneity and its impact on RAT solutions. A review of articles from 2019-2023 highlights the following causes of association structure heterogeneity: semantic memory features, linguistic features, associative structure and strengths, and task solution space. As a result, the homogeneity of association structure in RAT is more often associated with fluency, while heterogeneity is more often associated with flexibility. At the same time, both factors, being indicators of divergent thinking, are laid down in RAT modifications. However, recent articles predominantly emphasize fluency estimation. Only considering RAT through problem-solving space makes it possible to control the fluency factor. The conclusion is that RAT, combining divergent and convergent stages, in a certain sense restores the unity of creative and critical thinking.</p>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Experimental Psychology (Russia)
Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2024170406
Primary Topic
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

RAT Association’s Structure: Measuring Fluency and Flexibility of Thinking

Valeria Lukianova
Experimental Psychology (Russia)
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
article

RAT Association’s Structure: Measuring Fluency and Flexibility of Thinking

Valeria Lukianova
article en

Abstract

<p>The Remote Association Test (RAT) or Mednick's task is used to assess creative thinking and investigate insight. Despite various modifications of RAT (CRAT, fRAT, vRAT, LI-RAT) and their adaptations in different languages, the problem of heterogeneity of the association structure remains unsolved. The purpose of this paper is to analyze papers devoted to association structure heterogeneity and its impact on RAT solutions. A review of articles from 2019-2023 highlights the following causes of association structure heterogeneity: semantic memory features, linguistic features, associative structure and strengths, and task solution space. As a result, the homogeneity of association structure in RAT is more often associated with fluency, while heterogeneity is more often associated with flexibility. At the same time, both factors, being indicators of divergent thinking, are laid down in RAT modifications. However, recent articles predominantly emphasize fluency estimation. Only considering RAT through problem-solving space makes it possible to control the fluency factor. The conclusion is that RAT, combining divergent and convergent stages, in a certain sense restores the unity of creative and critical thinking.</p>

Experimental Psychology (Russia)Vol. 17(4)
Lomonosov Moscow State University (RU), Moscow State University (TJ)
Russian Science Foundation
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

RAT Association’s Structure: Measuring Fluency and Flexibility of Thinking — Valeria Lukianova · Experimental Psychology (Russia) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS