Was the Section française de l’Internationale ouvrière also African? 1945–1960

Abstract This article looks at relations between Europeans and Africans within the sections of the Section française de l’Internationale ouvrière (SFIO) in sub-Saharan Africa. It is based on documentation and correspondence sent to the Paris Centre, mostly by Europeans, and held at the Office universitaire de recherche socialiste. There were, however, significant differences between the sections in French West Africa (Ivory Coast and Guinea) and those in French East Africa (Chad, Oubangui-Chari, Congo-Brazzaville) and Cameroon. The relationships of domination inherent in the colonial situation were expressed more or less violently in different places. The way in which Europeans in the African SFIO looked at Africans in the sections was generally racist and unsympathetic, and thus said a great deal about power relations in the colonial world. In the end, these relationships of domination got the better of the sections, whose fate was definitively sealed by the advent of African governments and then independence, despite the short-lived experience of the Mouvement socialiste africain.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
French History
Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/fh/crae050
Primary Topic
Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Was the Section française de l’Internationale ouvrière also African? 1945–1960

Françoise Blum
French History
Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
article

Was the Section française de l’Internationale ouvrière also African? 1945–1960

Françoise Blum
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article looks at relations between Europeans and Africans within the sections of the Section française de l’Internationale ouvrière (SFIO) in sub-Saharan Africa. It is based on documentation and correspondence sent to the Paris Centre, mostly by Europeans, and held at the Office universitaire de recherche socialiste. There were, however, significant differences between the sections in French West Africa (Ivory Coast and Guinea) and those in French East Africa (Chad, Oubangui-Chari, Congo-Brazzaville) and Cameroon. The relationships of domination inherent in the colonial situation were expressed more or less violently in different places. The way in which Europeans in the African SFIO looked at Africans in the sections was generally racist and unsympathetic, and thus said a great deal about power relations in the colonial world. In the end, these relationships of domination got the better of the sections, whose fate was definitively sealed by the advent of African governments and then independence, despite the short-lived experience of the Mouvement socialiste africain.

French HistoryVol. 39(1)
Centre d’histoire de Sciences Po (FR), Établissement public Campus Condorcet (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.