Hybrid Cooperative Crayfish and Mountain Gazelle Algorithm for Global Optimization

The crayfish optimization algorithm (COA) and mountain gazelle optimization algorithm (MGO) have emerged as two powerful metaheuristics for global optimization. It has been shown that these two metaheuristics outperform conventional metaheuristics and are capable of finding near-optimal solutions for most of the benchmark functions. However, in certain benchmark functions, COA and MGO do not perform better than the conventional metaheuristics. To this end, a new Hybrid Cooperative COA-MGO algorithm (HCCMGA) is proposed. In the proposed HCCMGA algorithm, the solution vector is split into two solution subvectors of smaller dimensions, one optimized by COA and the other by MGO. The fitness of each search agent in COA and MGA is evaluated in a cooperative manner, whereby the solution subvector in COA is combined with the best solution subvector from MGO and vice versa. The proposed HCCMGA is evaluated using 13 benchmark functions and is compared with several state-of-the-art metaheuristics. Results show that the proposed HCCMGA outperforms state-of-the-arts optimization algorithms in solution quality, search stability and convergence speed, as the HCCMGA achieves solutions closest to the optimum in eight out of the 13 benchmark functions with low standard deviations and less numbers of iterations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icitda64560.2024.10809637
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.69
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hybrid Cooperative Crayfish and Mountain Gazelle Algorithm for Global Optimization

Kok–Chin Khor, Y. J. Lee, B. H. Lee
2 citations
Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
0.69
article

Hybrid Cooperative Crayfish and Mountain Gazelle Algorithm for Global Optimization

Kok–Chin Khor, Y. J. Lee, B. H. Lee
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The crayfish optimization algorithm (COA) and mountain gazelle optimization algorithm (MGO) have emerged as two powerful metaheuristics for global optimization. It has been shown that these two metaheuristics outperform conventional metaheuristics and are capable of finding near-optimal solutions for most of the benchmark functions. However, in certain benchmark functions, COA and MGO do not perform better than the conventional metaheuristics. To this end, a new Hybrid Cooperative COA-MGO algorithm (HCCMGA) is proposed. In the proposed HCCMGA algorithm, the solution vector is split into two solution subvectors of smaller dimensions, one optimized by COA and the other by MGO. The fitness of each search agent in COA and MGA is evaluated in a cooperative manner, whereby the solution subvector in COA is combined with the best solution subvector from MGO and vice versa. The proposed HCCMGA is evaluated using 13 benchmark functions and is compared with several state-of-the-art metaheuristics. Results show that the proposed HCCMGA outperforms state-of-the-arts optimization algorithms in solution quality, search stability and convergence speed, as the HCCMGA achieves solutions closest to the optimum in eight out of the 13 benchmark functions with low standard deviations and less numbers of iterations.

Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
0.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Hybrid Cooperative Crayfish and Mountain Gazelle Algorithm for Global Optimization — Kok–Chin Khor, Y. J. Lee, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS