Experimental and explainable machine learning approach on thermal conductivity and viscosity of water based graphene oxide based mono and hybrid nanofluids

This study explores the thermal conductivity and viscosity of water-based nanofluids containing silicon dioxide, graphene oxide, titanium dioxide, and their hybrids across various concentrations (0 to 1 vol%) and temperatures (30 to 60 °C). The nanofluids, characterized using multiple methods, exhibited increased viscosity and thermal conductivity compared to water, with hybrid nanofluids showing superior performance. Graphene oxide nanofluids displayed the highest thermal conductivity and viscosity ratios, with increases of 52% and 177% at 60 °C and 30 °C, respectively, for a concentration of 1 vol% compared to base fluid. Similarly, graphene oxide-TiO<sub>2</sub> hybrid nanofluids achieved thermal conductivity and viscosity ratios exceeding 43% and 144% compared to the base fluid at similar conditions. This data highlights the significance of nanofluid concentration in influencing thermal conductivity, while temperature was found to have a more pronounced effect on viscosity. To tackle the challenge of modeling the thermophysical properties of these hybrid nanofluids, advanced machine learning models were applied. The Random Forest (RF) model outperformed others (Gradient Boosting and Decision Tree) in both the cases of thermal conductivity and viscosity with greater adaptability to handle fresh data during model testing. Further analysis using shapely additive explanations based on cooperative game theory revealed that relative to temperature, nanofluid concentration contributes more to the predictions of the thermal conductivity ratio model. However, the effect of nanofluid concentration was more dominant in the case of viscosity ratio model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2024-12-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-81955-1
Citations
24
Primary Topic
Nanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental and explainable machine learning approach on thermal conductivity and viscosity of water based graphene oxide based mono and hybrid nanofluids

Prabhakar Sharma, V. Vicki Wanatasanappan, Seshathiri Dhanasekaran, Praveen Kumar Kanti et al.
24 citations
Scientific Reports
Nanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer
4.43
article

Experimental and explainable machine learning approach on thermal conductivity and viscosity of water based graphene oxide based mono and hybrid nanofluids

Prabhakar Sharma, V. Vicki Wanatasanappan, Seshathiri Dhanasekaran, Praveen Kumar Kanti, Prabhu Paramasivam
article en
24 citations

Abstract

This study explores the thermal conductivity and viscosity of water-based nanofluids containing silicon dioxide, graphene oxide, titanium dioxide, and their hybrids across various concentrations (0 to 1 vol%) and temperatures (30 to 60 °C). The nanofluids, characterized using multiple methods, exhibited increased viscosity and thermal conductivity compared to water, with hybrid nanofluids showing superior performance. Graphene oxide nanofluids displayed the highest thermal conductivity and viscosity ratios, with increases of 52% and 177% at 60 °C and 30 °C, respectively, for a concentration of 1 vol% compared to base fluid. Similarly, graphene oxide-TiO<sub>2</sub> hybrid nanofluids achieved thermal conductivity and viscosity ratios exceeding 43% and 144% compared to the base fluid at similar conditions. This data highlights the significance of nanofluid concentration in influencing thermal conductivity, while temperature was found to have a more pronounced effect on viscosity. To tackle the challenge of modeling the thermophysical properties of these hybrid nanofluids, advanced machine learning models were applied. The Random Forest (RF) model outperformed others (Gradient Boosting and Decision Tree) in both the cases of thermal conductivity and viscosity with greater adaptability to handle fresh data during model testing. Further analysis using shapely additive explanations based on cooperative game theory revealed that relative to temperature, nanofluid concentration contributes more to the predictions of the thermal conductivity ratio model. However, the effect of nanofluid concentration was more dominant in the case of viscosity ratio model.

Scientific ReportsVol. 14(1)
Ethiopian Civil Service University (ET), Delhi Skill and Entrepreneurship University, Chitkara University (IN), UiT The Arctic University of Norway (NO), Universiti Tenaga Nasional (MY)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Nanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer
4.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.