Research on muck conditioning for EPB shield tunnelling in composite formation

Compared with simple formations, EPB (earth pressure balance) shield tunnelling in composite formations encounters severe problems with muck conditioning and require improved muck conditioning technology to fulfil expectations for continuous and efficient excavation. In the Nanchang Metro Line 4 Project, a water-rich sand-argillaceous siltstone composite formation is encountered. With a high moisture content and complex composite formation ratio, it is quite difficult to determine the optimum muck conditioning scheme, and thus, muck spewing accidents frequently occur during the tunnelling process. In this study, laboratory muck conditioning tests are conducted for five ratios of stratum, from a full section water-rich sand formation to a water-rich sand-argillaceous siltstone composite formation. The muck conditioner ratio for EPB shield tunnelling in such composite formations is dynamically optimized based on an analysis of propulsion speed, penetration rate, thrust force and torque of the shield machine in the field. The following muck conditioning scheme is obtained: (1) For the full-section water-rich sand layer, foam and bentonite slurry should have similar proportions, namely, the foam injection ratio is 10-15% and the bentonite slurry injection ratio is 10%. (2) As the argillaceous siltstone content increases from 10 to 90%, the foam injection rate gradually increases from 20 to 50%, and the bentonite slurry injection rate gradually decreases from 20% to 0. (3) If the argillaceous siltstone content is 10%, then CMC polymer with an injection ratio of 1% is required. Once the argillaceous siltstone content exceeds 70%, it is necessary to add mudstone dispersant solution (1:5) with a volume ratio of 2 to 3%. According to the analysis of the field tunnelling parameters, including penetration rate, total shield thrust and cutterhead torque, the optimization of the muck conditioning scheme proposed based on laboratory tests is proved effective and deserves further application.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2024-12-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-81757-5
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Tunneling and Rock Mechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.09

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research on muck conditioning for EPB shield tunnelling in composite formation

Yucong Pan, Kai Zhou, Yalong Jiang, Changjie Xu et al.
8 citations
Scientific Reports
Tunneling and Rock Mechanics
2.09
article

Research on muck conditioning for EPB shield tunnelling in composite formation

Yucong Pan, Kai Zhou, Yalong Jiang, Changjie Xu, Bitang Zhu, Xin Tang
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Compared with simple formations, EPB (earth pressure balance) shield tunnelling in composite formations encounters severe problems with muck conditioning and require improved muck conditioning technology to fulfil expectations for continuous and efficient excavation. In the Nanchang Metro Line 4 Project, a water-rich sand-argillaceous siltstone composite formation is encountered. With a high moisture content and complex composite formation ratio, it is quite difficult to determine the optimum muck conditioning scheme, and thus, muck spewing accidents frequently occur during the tunnelling process. In this study, laboratory muck conditioning tests are conducted for five ratios of stratum, from a full section water-rich sand formation to a water-rich sand-argillaceous siltstone composite formation. The muck conditioner ratio for EPB shield tunnelling in such composite formations is dynamically optimized based on an analysis of propulsion speed, penetration rate, thrust force and torque of the shield machine in the field. The following muck conditioning scheme is obtained: (1) For the full-section water-rich sand layer, foam and bentonite slurry should have similar proportions, namely, the foam injection ratio is 10-15% and the bentonite slurry injection ratio is 10%. (2) As the argillaceous siltstone content increases from 10 to 90%, the foam injection rate gradually increases from 20 to 50%, and the bentonite slurry injection rate gradually decreases from 20% to 0. (3) If the argillaceous siltstone content is 10%, then CMC polymer with an injection ratio of 1% is required. Once the argillaceous siltstone content exceeds 70%, it is necessary to add mudstone dispersant solution (1:5) with a volume ratio of 2 to 3%. According to the analysis of the field tunnelling parameters, including penetration rate, total shield thrust and cutterhead torque, the optimization of the muck conditioning scheme proposed based on laboratory tests is proved effective and deserves further application.

Scientific ReportsVol. 14(1)
East China Jiaotong University (CN), Wuhan University (CN), China Railway Construction Corporation (China) (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Tunneling and Rock Mechanics
2.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.