Magnetism‐structure triple point morphotropic phase boundary and resulting W‐type magnetostrictive effect in Ni <sub>50</sub> Mn <sub>34</sub> Sb <sub> 16− <i>x</i> </sub> Ga <sub> <i>x</i> </sub> Heusler alloys

Abstract The mutual coupling of structure and magnetism is crucial for Heusler alloys. In this paper, Ni 50 Mn 34 Sb 16− x Ga x (0 ≤ x ≤ 16) alloys were prepared by arc melting. Based on the test results of structure and magnetism, the magnetic‐structural phase diagram of Ni 50 Mn 34 Sb 16− x Ga x (0 ≤ x ≤ 16) was drawn. The structure changes from cubic to monoclinic and finally to tetragonal as the x increases at room temperature. Its phase diagram shows a morphotropic phase boundary (MPB) starting from a tricritical triple point (around the Ni 50 Mn 34 Sb 5 Ga 11 alloy) of a cubic paramagnetic phase, ferromagnetic monoclinic, and antiferromagnetic tetragonal phases. And Ni 50 Mn 34 Sb 5 Ga 11 alloy has experienced five different phase states: paramagnetic austenite → ferromagnetic austenite → antiferromagnetic martensite → ferromagnetic martensite → spin glass as the temperature decreased. Further study of the alloys’ magnetostrictive properties near the MPB showed that as x increases, a negative strain initially appears, followed by a W‐type that crosses negative and positive strains, and then a positive strain. This is caused by the inconsistency in the speed and degree of magnetic domain walls response with monoclinic and tetragonal coexisting structures. This indicates that coupling between structure and magnetism is critical to the properties of materials. This work provides valuable insights into the magnetostrictive behavior and structural evolution of Heusler alloys, particularly in the context of MPB systems, and offers guidance for the design and optimization of material properties through controlled magnetic‐structural interactions.Kindly check and confirm the edit made in the title.The edit made in the title has been confirmed to be accurate.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Rare Metals
Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12598-024-03116-7
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Shape Memory Alloy Transformations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Magnetism‐structure triple point morphotropic phase boundary and resulting W‐type magnetostrictive effect in Ni 50 Mn 34 Sb 16− x Ga x Heusler alloys

Kaiyan Cao, Chao Zhou, Fanghua Tian, Tieyan Chang et al.
3 citations
Rare Metals
Shape Memory Alloy Transformations
0.35
article

Magnetism‐structure triple point morphotropic phase boundary and resulting W‐type magnetostrictive effect in Ni 50 Mn 34 Sb 16− x Ga x Heusler alloys

Kaiyan Cao, Chao Zhou, Fanghua Tian, Tieyan Chang, Sen Kong, Yin Zhang, Xiaoping Song, Qizhong Zhao, Sen Yang, Zhiyong Dai, Jia-Le Guo
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract The mutual coupling of structure and magnetism is crucial for Heusler alloys. In this paper, Ni 50 Mn 34 Sb 16− x Ga x (0 ≤ x ≤ 16) alloys were prepared by arc melting. Based on the test results of structure and magnetism, the magnetic‐structural phase diagram of Ni 50 Mn 34 Sb 16− x Ga x (0 ≤ x ≤ 16) was drawn. The structure changes from cubic to monoclinic and finally to tetragonal as the x increases at room temperature. Its phase diagram shows a morphotropic phase boundary (MPB) starting from a tricritical triple point (around the Ni 50 Mn 34 Sb 5 Ga 11 alloy) of a cubic paramagnetic phase, ferromagnetic monoclinic, and antiferromagnetic tetragonal phases. And Ni 50 Mn 34 Sb 5 Ga 11 alloy has experienced five different phase states: paramagnetic austenite → ferromagnetic austenite → antiferromagnetic martensite → ferromagnetic martensite → spin glass as the temperature decreased. Further study of the alloys’ magnetostrictive properties near the MPB showed that as x increases, a negative strain initially appears, followed by a W‐type that crosses negative and positive strains, and then a positive strain. This is caused by the inconsistency in the speed and degree of magnetic domain walls response with monoclinic and tetragonal coexisting structures. This indicates that coupling between structure and magnetism is critical to the properties of materials. This work provides valuable insights into the magnetostrictive behavior and structural evolution of Heusler alloys, particularly in the context of MPB systems, and offers guidance for the design and optimization of material properties through controlled magnetic‐structural interactions.Kindly check and confirm the edit made in the title.The edit made in the title has been confirmed to be accurate.

Rare MetalsVol. 44(3)
University of Chicago (US), Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Shape Memory Alloy Transformations
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.