Balancing Education’s Purpose: Advocating the Capabilities Approach Amidst Neoliberal Challenges

This essay explores the evolving purpose of education through the lens of the Capabilities Approach (CA) and critiques of Neoliberalism. The CA, developed by Amartya Sen and Martha C. Nussbaum, emphasizes fostering individual well-being, social justice, and personal dignity through education. In contrast, Neoliberalism frames education primarily as an economic investment, prioritizing efficiency and market-driven outcomes. The essay critiques Neoliberalism’s commodification of education and its neglect of broader humanistic and social goals. It advocates for integrating CA as the central educational aim, proposing policies that balance economic adaptability with the holistic development of individuals. Drawing on personal experiences in English education, the essay demonstrates the application of CA principles to enhance personal growth and global participation. It concludes that adopting CA in education ensures equitable and inclusive practices that prioritize human dignity and societal well-being.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Education and Humanities
Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54097/zn6hgb78
Primary Topic
Education Systems and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Balancing Education’s Purpose: Advocating the Capabilities Approach Amidst Neoliberal Challenges

Fu‐Dong Shi
1 links
International Journal of Education and Humanities
Education Systems and Policy
article

Balancing Education’s Purpose: Advocating the Capabilities Approach Amidst Neoliberal Challenges

Fu‐Dong Shi
article en

Abstract

This essay explores the evolving purpose of education through the lens of the Capabilities Approach (CA) and critiques of Neoliberalism. The CA, developed by Amartya Sen and Martha C. Nussbaum, emphasizes fostering individual well-being, social justice, and personal dignity through education. In contrast, Neoliberalism frames education primarily as an economic investment, prioritizing efficiency and market-driven outcomes. The essay critiques Neoliberalism’s commodification of education and its neglect of broader humanistic and social goals. It advocates for integrating CA as the central educational aim, proposing policies that balance economic adaptability with the holistic development of individuals. Drawing on personal experiences in English education, the essay demonstrates the application of CA principles to enhance personal growth and global participation. It concludes that adopting CA in education ensures equitable and inclusive practices that prioritize human dignity and societal well-being.

International Journal of Education and HumanitiesVol. 17(3)
University of Glasgow (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Education Systems and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Balancing Education’s Purpose: Advocating the Capabilities Approach Amidst Neoliberal Challenges — Fu‐Dong Shi · International Journal of Education and Humanities (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS