Chloride threshold level determination: Call for test standardization to limit variations in experimental methodology and resolve inherent experimental and modelling detection challenges

Chloride-induced corrosion significantly threatens the durability of reinforced concrete structures, leading to deterioration, costly repairs, and potential structural failures. Accurately determining the steel reinforcing bar (rebar) chloride threshold level (CTL) is crucial for predicting corrosion onset, optimizing material selection, and estimating the service life of these structures. An ensemble machine learning model was trained using literature CTL data. Despite achieving a mean absolute error of 0.218 % weight of binder, a root mean square error of 0.321 % weight of binder, and an R² value of 0.751 on unseen data, the model's performance reveals limitations due to the wide variability in reported CTL, stemming from disparities in experimental methodologies including set-up and corrosion detection techniques. After model development, this paper also investigates challenges associated with CTL evaluation by comparing literature practices and providing insights to enhance data reliability and comparability. Factors impacting CTL evaluation includes corrosion detection techniques, initiation criteria, chloride introduction methods, testing setup, exposure solution compositions, chloride concentration measurement techniques, and rebar concrete/mortar cover thickness. This paper focused on the largely ignored aspect of these factors, some of which are inherent and nearly non-circumventable, and will continue to lead to suboptimal performance of any CTL predictive model when not addressed. Recommendations for standardizing practices are proposed to improve CTL assessment consistency, reliability of developed CTL predictive models, and accuracy of service life modeling. • The ensemble model achieved 0.218 % MAE and 0.321 % RMSE in CTL predictions. • CTL variability stems from inconsistent experimental methods across studies. • Standardized testing is proposed to improve CTL data reliability and consistency. • Emphasized need for uniform corrosion detection and chloride measurement. • Recommendations aim to enhance CTL model accuracy and service life predictions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Case Studies in Construction Materials
Published
2024-12-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e04167
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Analytical Chemistry and Sensors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.58
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Chloride threshold level determination: Call for test standardization to limit variations in experimental methodology and resolve inherent experimental and modelling detection challenges

Ibrahim G. Ogunsanya, Nicolas Maamary
2 citations
Case Studies in Construction Materials
Analytical Chemistry and Sensors
0.58
article

Chloride threshold level determination: Call for test standardization to limit variations in experimental methodology and resolve inherent experimental and modelling detection challenges

Ibrahim G. Ogunsanya, Nicolas Maamary
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Chloride-induced corrosion significantly threatens the durability of reinforced concrete structures, leading to deterioration, costly repairs, and potential structural failures. Accurately determining the steel reinforcing bar (rebar) chloride threshold level (CTL) is crucial for predicting corrosion onset, optimizing material selection, and estimating the service life of these structures. An ensemble machine learning model was trained using literature CTL data. Despite achieving a mean absolute error of 0.218 % weight of binder, a root mean square error of 0.321 % weight of binder, and an R² value of 0.751 on unseen data, the model's performance reveals limitations due to the wide variability in reported CTL, stemming from disparities in experimental methodologies including set-up and corrosion detection techniques. After model development, this paper also investigates challenges associated with CTL evaluation by comparing literature practices and providing insights to enhance data reliability and comparability. Factors impacting CTL evaluation includes corrosion detection techniques, initiation criteria, chloride introduction methods, testing setup, exposure solution compositions, chloride concentration measurement techniques, and rebar concrete/mortar cover thickness. This paper focused on the largely ignored aspect of these factors, some of which are inherent and nearly non-circumventable, and will continue to lead to suboptimal performance of any CTL predictive model when not addressed. Recommendations for standardizing practices are proposed to improve CTL assessment consistency, reliability of developed CTL predictive models, and accuracy of service life modeling. • The ensemble model achieved 0.218 % MAE and 0.321 % RMSE in CTL predictions. • CTL variability stems from inconsistent experimental methods across studies. • Standardized testing is proposed to improve CTL data reliability and consistency. • Emphasized need for uniform corrosion detection and chloride measurement. • Recommendations aim to enhance CTL model accuracy and service life predictions.

Case Studies in Construction MaterialsVol. 22
University of Toronto (CA)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Analytical Chemistry and Sensors
0.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.